Comparison Overview

Heavy Mechanical Complex (HMC)

VS

MAG ENGINEERING

Heavy Mechanical Complex (HMC)

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Heavy Mechanical Complex (Private) Limited is a leading engineering goods manufacturing enterprise in Pakistan located at Taxila about 30 Kilometers north of capital Islamabad. It is a professionally managed progressive organization with over 160,000 sq. meters covered facilities and 1,100 employees. HMC have the resources to handle large projects with demanding delivery schedules. Being the largest and most extensive fabrication and machining facility equipped with state of the art technology. HMC provide manufacturing services both on our own or customers design. HMC have gained rich experience in designing and manufacturing of large projects through collaboration with internationally reputed engineering organizations. All its processing facilities are in-house including Designing, Fabrication, Machining, Iron and Steel Castings, Forgings, Heat Treatment, Assembly, Sand Blasting, Painting and Galvanizing etc. HMC is ISO 9001 certified and is authorized to use 4 ASME stamps U, U2, S & PP for equipment manufactured according to ASME code. The manufacturing is backed by excellent quality control and testing facilities to meet the product and customer quality requirements. 3rd party inspection facilities are also available, where required.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 326
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

MAG ENGINEERING

via Terenzio, Roma, 00193, IT
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

MAG Engineering è una società d'ingegneria, che propone la progettazione e la realizzazione di sistemi integrati, nei diversi settori industriali e nella ricerca scientifica. L'esperienza pluriennale dei professionisti MAG, nei campi scientifici e produttivi delle tecnologie dell'alto vuoto come simulazione spaziale, sputtering e criogenia, dalla progettazione CAD 3D, all'informatizzazione e virtualizzazione degli strumenti elettronici, consente alla MAG Engineering di allinearsi ai migliori standard qualitativi. L'Azienda progetta e realizza Set-Up per la simulazione spaziale e per supporto satelliti, come M.G.S.E. (Mechanical Ground Support Equipment) ed E.G.S.E. (Electrical Ground Support Equipment). Per il settore Spazio e scientifico, MAG propone shorud ad azoto liquido e sistemi custom completi, come Simulatori Spaziali e camere termiche. MAG Engineering sviluppa e integra nei propri sistemi, software e hardware, sia Desktop che Mobili (Apple OSX, iOS), che garantiscono produttività e affidabilità. La virtualizzazione strumentale LABVIEW National Instruments, che consente di gestire e controllare sia impianti industriali che indagini scientifiche ad alto livello, e la sicurezza garantita dalle schede industriali Siemens, soddisfano le esigenze in ogni settore. Inoltre, MAG Engineering studia sistemi di sicurezza che consentono di operare in ambienti di lavoro potenzialmente pericolosi, come per es. il monitoraggio della respirabilità dell'aria.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 33
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/heavy-mechanical-complex-hmc-.jpeg
Heavy Mechanical Complex (HMC)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mag-engineering.jpeg
MAG ENGINEERING
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Heavy Mechanical Complex (HMC)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MAG ENGINEERING
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Heavy Mechanical Complex (HMC) in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MAG ENGINEERING in 2025.

Incident History — Heavy Mechanical Complex (HMC) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Heavy Mechanical Complex (HMC) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MAG ENGINEERING (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MAG ENGINEERING cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/heavy-mechanical-complex-hmc-.jpeg
Heavy Mechanical Complex (HMC)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mag-engineering.jpeg
MAG ENGINEERING
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Heavy Mechanical Complex (HMC) company and MAG ENGINEERING company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, MAG ENGINEERING company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Heavy Mechanical Complex (HMC) company.

In the current year, MAG ENGINEERING company and Heavy Mechanical Complex (HMC) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither MAG ENGINEERING company nor Heavy Mechanical Complex (HMC) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither MAG ENGINEERING company nor Heavy Mechanical Complex (HMC) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither MAG ENGINEERING company nor Heavy Mechanical Complex (HMC) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Heavy Mechanical Complex (HMC) company nor MAG ENGINEERING company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Heavy Mechanical Complex (HMC) nor MAG ENGINEERING holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Heavy Mechanical Complex (HMC) company nor MAG ENGINEERING company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Heavy Mechanical Complex (HMC) company employs more people globally than MAG ENGINEERING company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Heavy Mechanical Complex (HMC) nor MAG ENGINEERING holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Heavy Mechanical Complex (HMC) nor MAG ENGINEERING holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Heavy Mechanical Complex (HMC) nor MAG ENGINEERING holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Heavy Mechanical Complex (HMC) nor MAG ENGINEERING holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Heavy Mechanical Complex (HMC) nor MAG ENGINEERING holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Heavy Mechanical Complex (HMC) nor MAG ENGINEERING holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H