Comparison Overview

Healthscope

VS

Bon Secours

Healthscope

Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Strong

Healthscope is a leading private healthcare provider with 38 hospitals across Australia. We strive to be the best place to work and care in Australian healthcare. Our team of over 19,000 employees make an impact 24/7, 365 days a year by providing exceptional care to the more than 650,000 Australians we see each year.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 3,954
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Bon Secours

1505 Marriottsville Road, None, Marriottsville, Maryland, US, 21104
Last Update: 2025-07-27 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900

Bon Secours Health System, Inc. based in Marriottsville, Maryland, is a $3.2 billion dollar not-for-profit Catholic health system that owns, manages or joint ventures 18 acute care, 5 long term care, 4 assisted living, 6 retirement communities/senior housing, 14 home care and hospice services, and other facilities, primarily on the East Coast. Bon Secours Health System consists of more than 24,000 caregivers helping people in seven states. Its vision is to be a prophetic Catholic health ministry partnering with communities to create a more humane world, build health and social justice and provide exceptional value for those served.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 10,305
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/healthscope.jpeg
Healthscope
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bon-secours-health-system.jpeg
Bon Secours
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Healthscope
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bon Secours
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Healthscope in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bon Secours in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Healthscope (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Healthscope cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Bon Secours (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bon Secours cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/healthscope.jpeg
Healthscope
Incidents

Date Detected: 03/2017
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bon-secours-health-system.jpeg
Bon Secours
Incidents

Date Detected: 08/2016
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2016
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Inadvertent Exposure (Misconfigured Internet-Accessible Files)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both Healthscope company and Bon Secours company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Bon Secours company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Healthscope company.

In the current year, Bon Secours company and Healthscope company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bon Secours company nor Healthscope company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Bon Secours company and Healthscope company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither Bon Secours company nor Healthscope company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Healthscope company nor Bon Secours company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Healthscope company nor Bon Secours company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bon Secours company employs more people globally than Healthscope company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

pwn.college DOJO is an education platform for learning cybersecurity. In versions up to and including commit 781d91157cfc234a434d0bab45cbcf97894c642e, the /workspace endpoint contains an improper authentication vulnerability that allows an attacker to access any active Windows VM without proper authorization. The vulnerability occurs in the view_desktop function where the user is retrieved via a URL parameter without verifying that the requester has administrative privileges. An attacker can supply any user ID and arbitrary password in the request parameters to impersonate another user. When requesting a Windows desktop service, the function does not validate the supplied password before generating access credentials, allowing the attacker to obtain an iframe source URL that grants full access to the target user's Windows VM. This impacts all users with active Windows VMs, as an attacker can access and modify data on the Windows machine and in the home directory of the associated Linux machine via the Z: drive. This issue has been patched in commit 467db0b9ea0d9a929dc89b41f6eb59f7cfc68bef. No known workarounds exist.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:H/SI:H/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Adobe Experience Manager versions 11.6 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victimโ€™s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious link. Scope is changed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

Adobe Experience Manager versions 11.6 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victimโ€™s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious link. Scope is changed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

Adobe Experience Manager versions 11.6 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victimโ€™s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious link. Scope is changed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

Adobe Connect versions 12.9 and earlier are affected by a URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect') vulnerability. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to redirect users to malicious websites. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must click on a crafted link.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N