Comparison Overview

Healthier Colorado

VS

Gemeente Rheden

Healthier Colorado

1536 Wynkoop st st 224, Denver, Colorado, 80202, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Healthier Colorado is a 501(c)(4) with a broad mission to improve Coloradans’ health through policy changes that increase access to quality care or support healthy living. Healthier Colorado is the state’s first and only health advocacy organization that focuses specifically on policy change. The organization is focused on building a grassroots network of Coloradans willing to advocate for a healthier state.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Gemeente Rheden

Postbus 9110, DE STEEG, NL
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

Gemeente Rheden ligt tussen de IJssel en de Posbank en bestaat uit zeven dorpen: Velp, Rheden, De Steeg, Ellecom, Spankeren, Dieren en Laag-Soeren.De Posbank, liggend in het Nationaal Park Veluwezoom, geniet landelijke bekendheid. De gemeente heeft zo'n 43.000 inwoners. Onze inzet als gemeente is het waarborgen van de leefbaarheid van onze dorpen. Wij vinden het erg belangrijk om onze inwoners hierbij te betrekken. Daarom wordt het beleidsproces op een interactieve manier vormgegeven. De Steeg · http://www.rheden.nl

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition: Executive, Legislative, and Other General Government Support
Employees: 540
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/healthier-colorado.jpeg
Healthier Colorado
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gemeente-rheden.jpeg
Gemeente Rheden
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Healthier Colorado
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gemeente Rheden
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Healthier Colorado in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gemeente Rheden in 2025.

Incident History — Healthier Colorado (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Healthier Colorado cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gemeente Rheden (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gemeente Rheden cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/healthier-colorado.jpeg
Healthier Colorado
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gemeente-rheden.jpeg
Gemeente Rheden
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Gemeente Rheden company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Healthier Colorado company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Gemeente Rheden company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Healthier Colorado company.

In the current year, Gemeente Rheden company and Healthier Colorado company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gemeente Rheden company nor Healthier Colorado company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Gemeente Rheden company nor Healthier Colorado company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Gemeente Rheden company nor Healthier Colorado company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Healthier Colorado company nor Gemeente Rheden company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Healthier Colorado nor Gemeente Rheden holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Healthier Colorado company nor Gemeente Rheden company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Gemeente Rheden company employs more people globally than Healthier Colorado company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither Healthier Colorado nor Gemeente Rheden holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Healthier Colorado nor Gemeente Rheden holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Healthier Colorado nor Gemeente Rheden holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Healthier Colorado nor Gemeente Rheden holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Healthier Colorado nor Gemeente Rheden holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Healthier Colorado nor Gemeente Rheden holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H