Comparison Overview

HealthEquity

VS

Aboitiz Group

HealthEquity

15 W Scenic Pointe Dr, Ste 100, Draper, UT, US, 84020
Last Update: 2025-11-23
Between 600 and 649

HealthEquity is a leading administrator of Health Savings Accounts (HSAs) and other consumer-directed benefits—FSA, HRA, COBRA, and Commuter. Benefits advisors, health plans, and retirement providers partner with us to help over 16 million members work toward long-term health and financial wellbeing. Visit HealthEquity.com to see our intuitive technology and remarkable service in action.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 2,285
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
3

Aboitiz Group

NAC Tower, 32nd Street,, Bonifacio Global City, Taguig City, PH
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 750 and 799

Here at Aboitiz, we aim to change today to shape the future. With five generations of success behind us, the Aboitiz Group is currently transforming into the Philippines’ first techglomerate. Amidst this evolution, we remain committed to our core mission of driving change for a better world by advancing businesses and communities.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 11,396
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/healthequity.jpeg
HealthEquity
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aboitiz.jpeg
Aboitiz Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
HealthEquity
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Aboitiz Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HealthEquity in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aboitiz Group in 2025.

Incident History — HealthEquity (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HealthEquity cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Aboitiz Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aboitiz Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/healthequity.jpeg
HealthEquity
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2024
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2018
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aboitiz.jpeg
Aboitiz Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Aboitiz Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to HealthEquity company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

HealthEquity company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Aboitiz Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, Aboitiz Group company and HealthEquity company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Aboitiz Group company nor HealthEquity company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

HealthEquity company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Aboitiz Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

HealthEquity company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Aboitiz Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither HealthEquity company nor Aboitiz Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither HealthEquity nor Aboitiz Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither HealthEquity company nor Aboitiz Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Aboitiz Group company employs more people globally than HealthEquity company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither HealthEquity nor Aboitiz Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither HealthEquity nor Aboitiz Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither HealthEquity nor Aboitiz Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither HealthEquity nor Aboitiz Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither HealthEquity nor Aboitiz Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither HealthEquity nor Aboitiz Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H