Healthcare Therapy Services, Inc. Breach Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (HEA4302543111325)

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Healthcare Therapy Services, Inc. breach identified under incident ID HEA4302543111325.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Healthcare Therapy Services, Inc.'s information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/healthcare-therapy-services-inc, the number of followers: 1750, the industry type: Hospitals and Health Care and the number of employees: 192 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 732 and after the incident was 675 with a difference of -57 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Healthcare Therapy Services, Inc. and their customers.

On 12 November 2025, Healthcare Therapy Services, Inc. (HTS) disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Healthcare Therapy Services, Inc. (HTS) Data Breach".

An unauthorized person gained access to Healthcare Therapy Services, Inc.'s (HTS) network and may have acquired records containing personally identifiable information (PII) and protected health information (PHI), including names in combination with drivers’ license numbers, fi...

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personally Identifiable Information (PII), Protected Health Information (PHI) and Names, with nearly Unknown records at risk.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public disclosure via press release (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) and potential notifications to affected individuals (implied by mention of data breach notice letters). Legal firm (Lynch Carpenter, LLP) is investigating claims and offering case reviews for affected individuals.

The case underscores how Under investigation by Lynch Carpenter, LLP for potential legal claims, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Affected individuals are advised to contact Lynch Carpenter, LLP for a case review via their website or provided contact details (Jerry Wells at (412) 322-9243 or [email protected]).

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized individual accessed its network (implies abuse of legitimate credentials or accounts) and External Remote Services (T1133) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating network access by unauthorized individual (method unspecified, but remote access likely). Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating acquired records containing PII/PHI such as names, SSNs, financial account info, medical records. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol (T1048) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating records may have been acquired by unauthorized person (implies data transfer out of network) and Automated Exfiltration (T1020) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unknown number of individuals affected (suggests bulk data collection/exfiltration). Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data from Cloud Storage Object (T1598) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating pII/PHI compromise (often stored in cloud databases in healthcare; exact method unspecified) and Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no explicit mention of destruction, but high-risk data exposure implies potential tampering. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access suggests poor credential hygiene (e.g., weak/default passwords, reused credentials). These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.