Comparison Overview

HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley

VS

Highmark Health

HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley

105 Mary's Ave, Kingston, 12401, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://http://www.hahv.org

HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley, a member of Westchester Medical Center Health Network (WMCHealth) is the alignment of HealthAlliance Hospital in Kingston, N.Y., and Margaretville Hospital and Mountainside Residential Care Center in Margaretville, N.Y. For further information about HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley, visit our web site or follow us on social media. Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/healthalliancehv/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/HAllianceHudVal Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/healthalliancehv

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 185
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Highmark Health

120 5th Ave, Pittsburgh, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 700 and 749
http://www.highmarkhealth.org

A national blended health organization, Highmark Health and our leading businesses support millions of customers with products, services and solutions closely aligned to our mission of creating remarkable health experiences, freeing people to be their best. Headquartered in Pittsburgh, we're regionally focused in Pennsylvania, Delaware, West Virginia and New York, with customers in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. We passionately serve individual consumers and fellow businesses alike. Our companies cover a diversified spectrum of essential health-related needs, including health insurance, health care delivery, population health management, dental solutions, reinsurance solutions, and innovative technology solutions. Our financial position reflects strength and stability, with our year-end 2024 consolidated revenues totaling $29.4 billion. We’re also proud to carry forth an important legacy of compassionate care and philanthropy that began more than 170 years ago. This tradition of giving back, reinvesting and ensuring that our communities remain strong and healthy is deeply embedded in our culture, informing our decisions every day.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 15,521
Subsidiaries: 13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/healthalliance-of-the-hudson-valley.jpeg
HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/highmark-health.jpeg
Highmark Health
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Highmark Health
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Highmark Health in 2026.

Incident History — HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Highmark Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Highmark Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/healthalliance-of-the-hudson-valley.jpeg
HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Vulnerability Exploitation
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/highmark-health.jpeg
Highmark Health
Incidents

Date Detected: 06/2023
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Account Takeover
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: External Hacking
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2022
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Highmark Health company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Highmark Health company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley company.

In the current year, Highmark Health company and HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Highmark Health company nor HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Highmark Health company and HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Highmark Health company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley company nor Highmark Health company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley nor Highmark Health holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Highmark Health company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley company.

Highmark Health company employs more people globally than HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley nor Highmark Health holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley nor Highmark Health holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley nor Highmark Health holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley nor Highmark Health holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley nor Highmark Health holds HIPAA certification.

Neither HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley nor Highmark Health holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References
Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.

Published
Date
2026-01-23
Updated
Date
2026-01-23
References