Comparison Overview

HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley

VS

Ascension

HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley

105 Mary's Ave, Kingston, NY, 12401, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
View Profile
Between 550 and 599
http://www.hahv.org

HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley, a member of Westchester Medical Center Health Network (WMCHealth) is the alignment of HealthAlliance Hospital in Kingston, N.Y., and Margaretville Hospital and Mountainside Residential Care Center in Margaretville, N.Y. For further information about HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley, visit our web site or follow us on social media. Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/healthalliancehv/ Twitter: https://twitter.com/HAllianceHudVal Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/healthalliancehv

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 192
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2
View Profile

Ascension

101 South Hanley Rd., Suite 450, St. Louis, MO, US, 63105
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 0 and 549
http://www.ascension.org/

Answering God's call to bring health, healing and hope to all. Ascension is one of the nation’s leading non-profit and Catholic health systems, with a Mission of delivering compassionate, personalized care to all, with special attention to those most vulnerable. In FY2025, Ascension provided $1.7 billion in care of persons living in poverty and other community benefit programs along with $1.8 billion of unreimbursed care for Medicare patients. Across 16 states and the District of Columbia, Ascension’s network encompasses approximately 99,000 associates, 22,300 aligned providers, 95 wholly owned or consolidated hospitals, and ownership interests in 26 additional hospitals through partnerships. Ascension also operates 30 senior living facilities and a variety of other care sites offering a range of healthcare services.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 66,110
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/healthalliance-of-the-hudson-valley.jpeg
HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ascensionorg.jpeg
Ascension
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ascension
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

Ascension has 31.58% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ascension (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ascension cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/healthalliance-of-the-hudson-valley.jpeg
HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Vulnerability Exploitation
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Unpatched Vulnerability
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ascensionorg.jpeg
Ascension
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Vulnerability in third-party software
Motivation: Data theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Social Engineering
Motivation: Financial
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

FAQ

HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ascension company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Ascension company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley company.

In the current year, Ascension company has reported more cyber incidents than HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley company.

Ascension company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both Ascension company and HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Ascension company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley company has not reported such incidents publicly.

HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Ascension company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley nor Ascension holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley company nor Ascension company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Ascension company employs more people globally than HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley nor Ascension holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley nor Ascension holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley nor Ascension holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley nor Ascension holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley nor Ascension holds HIPAA certification.

Neither HealthAlliance of the Hudson Valley nor Ascension holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References