Comparison Overview

Upper Foundation

VS

Center for Youth Wellness

Upper Foundation

undefined, Wilmington, North Carolina, 28403, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Historically founded and known as Health Possible Inc. (2017), the Upper Foundation (2023) supports the services of Upper Health (www.upper.health) by providing financial aid (“charity care”) for qualified applicant’s through Upper’s vetted provider network of holistic and nature-first lifestyle medicine services. Donate today to support affordable nature-first healthcare for people and communities.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Center for Youth Wellness

3450 Third Street, Bldg. 2, San Francisco, CA, 94124, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21

At CYW we raise awareness about the connections between chronic, toxic stress, caused by early adversity and harm, to the developing brains and bodies of children and their long-term health. CYW partners with communities to identify pathways, build capacity, and remove barriers to the care and treatment of children and families exposed to Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) and toxic stress. Our mission is to improve the health of children and adolescents exposed to ACEs.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/health-possible-inc.jpeg
Upper Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-youth-wellness.jpeg
Center for Youth Wellness
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Upper Foundation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Center for Youth Wellness
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Upper Foundation in 2025.

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Center for Youth Wellness in 2025.

Incident History — Upper Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Upper Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Center for Youth Wellness (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Center for Youth Wellness cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/health-possible-inc.jpeg
Upper Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/center-for-youth-wellness.jpeg
Center for Youth Wellness
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Upper Foundation company and Center for Youth Wellness company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Center for Youth Wellness company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Upper Foundation company.

In the current year, Center for Youth Wellness company and Upper Foundation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Center for Youth Wellness company nor Upper Foundation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Center for Youth Wellness company nor Upper Foundation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Center for Youth Wellness company nor Upper Foundation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Upper Foundation company nor Center for Youth Wellness company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Upper Foundation nor Center for Youth Wellness holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Upper Foundation company nor Center for Youth Wellness company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Center for Youth Wellness company employs more people globally than Upper Foundation company, reflecting its scale as a Health and Human Services.

Neither Upper Foundation nor Center for Youth Wellness holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Upper Foundation nor Center for Youth Wellness holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Upper Foundation nor Center for Youth Wellness holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Upper Foundation nor Center for Youth Wellness holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Upper Foundation nor Center for Youth Wellness holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Upper Foundation nor Center for Youth Wellness holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H