Comparison Overview

Home Care Providers of Texas

VS

Visiting Angels

Home Care Providers of Texas

Last Update: 2025-12-04
Between 650 and 699

Working to restore the highest quality of life possible to our patients throughout Texas.

NAICS: 6216
NAICS Definition: Home Health Care Services
Employees: 58
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Visiting Angels

937 Haverford Road, Bryn Mawr, Pennsylvania, 19010, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01

America's Choice in Home Care and Caregiver's Choice in Employment. Visiting Angels in-home care helps make it possible for seniors and adults with special needs to continue to live at home; while maintaining the independence of their daily routines and familiar surroundings. We provide non-medical home care customized to the needs of each client. Our caregivers are the lifeblood of our business, providing compassionate and dependable assistance with the activities of everyday living to seniors, the disabled, and those recovering from surgery. Our services include light housekeeping, meal preparation, errands and shopping, and personal hygiene assistance. Above all, Visiting Angels services help families spend mutually-rewarding and meaningful time with their loved ones and help provide comfort and peace of mind to those who face the challenge of long-distance caregiving.

NAICS: 6216
NAICS Definition: Home Health Care Services
Employees: 10,107
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hcp-of-tx.jpeg
Home Care Providers of Texas
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/visitingangels.jpeg
Visiting Angels
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Home Care Providers of Texas
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Visiting Angels
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Home Health Care Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Home Care Providers of Texas in 2025.

Incidents vs Home Health Care Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Visiting Angels in 2025.

Incident History — Home Care Providers of Texas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Home Care Providers of Texas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Visiting Angels (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Visiting Angels cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hcp-of-tx.jpeg
Home Care Providers of Texas
Incidents

Date Detected: 01/2023
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/visitingangels.jpeg
Visiting Angels
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Visiting Angels company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Home Care Providers of Texas company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Home Care Providers of Texas company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Visiting Angels company has not reported any.

In the current year, Visiting Angels company and Home Care Providers of Texas company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Home Care Providers of Texas company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Visiting Angels company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Visiting Angels company nor Home Care Providers of Texas company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Visiting Angels company nor Home Care Providers of Texas company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Home Care Providers of Texas company nor Visiting Angels company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Home Care Providers of Texas nor Visiting Angels holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Home Care Providers of Texas company nor Visiting Angels company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Visiting Angels company employs more people globally than Home Care Providers of Texas company, reflecting its scale as a Home Health Care Services.

Neither Home Care Providers of Texas nor Visiting Angels holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Home Care Providers of Texas nor Visiting Angels holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Home Care Providers of Texas nor Visiting Angels holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Home Care Providers of Texas nor Visiting Angels holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Home Care Providers of Texas nor Visiting Angels holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Home Care Providers of Texas nor Visiting Angels holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X