Comparison Overview

Hayman Consulting Group

VS

Korn Ferry

Hayman Consulting Group

undefined, undefined, undefined, 20854, US
Last Update: 2025-03-06 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Go to website for current description of our scope of work.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Korn Ferry

1900 Avenue of The Stars, Suite 2600, Los Angeles, CA, US, 90067
Last Update: 2025-07-28 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900

Korn Ferry is a global consulting firm that powers performance. We unlock the potential in your people and unleash transformation across your businessโ€”synchronizing strategy, operations, and talent to accelerate performance, fuel growth, and inspire a legacy of change. Thatโ€™s why the worldโ€™s most forward-thinking companies across every major industry turn to usโ€”for a shared commitment to lasting impact and the bold ambition to Be More Than.

NAICS: 5416
NAICS Definition: Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees: 18,756
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Hayman Consulting Group
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kornferry.jpeg
Korn Ferry
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Hayman Consulting Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Korn Ferry
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hayman Consulting Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Korn Ferry in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Hayman Consulting Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hayman Consulting Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Korn Ferry (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Korn Ferry cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Hayman Consulting Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kornferry.jpeg
Korn Ferry
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2012
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Hayman Consulting Group company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to Korn Ferry company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

Korn Ferry company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Hayman Consulting Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, Korn Ferry company and Hayman Consulting Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Korn Ferry company nor Hayman Consulting Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Korn Ferry company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Hayman Consulting Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Korn Ferry company nor Hayman Consulting Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hayman Consulting Group company nor Korn Ferry company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Korn Ferry company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Hayman Consulting Group company.

Korn Ferry company employs more people globally than Hayman Consulting Group company, reflecting its scale as a Business Consulting and Services.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Formbricks is an open source qualtrics alternative. Prior to version 4.0.1, Formbricks is missing JWT signature verification. This vulnerability stems from a token validation routine that only decodes JWTs (jwt.decode) without verifying their signatures. Both the email verification token login path and the password reset server action use the same validator, which does not check the tokenโ€™s signature, expiration, issuer, or audience. If an attacker learns the victimโ€™s actual user.id, they can craft an arbitrary JWT with an alg: "none" header and use it to authenticate and reset the victimโ€™s password. This issue has been patched in version 4.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Apollo Studio Embeddable Explorer & Embeddable Sandbox are website embeddable software solutions from Apollo GraphQL. Prior to Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3, a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified. The vulnerability arises from missing origin validation in the client-side code that handles window.postMessage events. A malicious website can send forged messages to the embedding page, causing the victimโ€™s browser to execute arbitrary GraphQL queries or mutations against their GraphQL server while authenticated with the victimโ€™s cookies. This issue has been patched in Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /consulta-dispensas. Such manipulation leads to improper authorization. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected is an unknown function of the file /module/Api/aluno. This manipulation of the argument aluno_id causes improper authorization. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Tencent WeKnora 0.1.0. This impacts the function testEmbeddingModel of the file /api/v1/initialization/embedding/test. The manipulation of the argument baseUrl results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. The vendor responds: "We have confirmed that the issue mentioned in the report does not exist in the latest releases".

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X