Comparison Overview

Haws EMEA

VS

ANDRITZ Recycling

Haws EMEA

Bachweg 3, Burgdorf, 3400, CH
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 800 and 849

For over 115 years, Haws® has been a leading designer and manufacturer of emergency showers and drinking fountains used in many industrial sectors. With a constant focus on quality, service and innovation, we have developed into an ISO 9001 certified company since 1993. We create solutions to keep people safe. In addition to our broad product line, we offer our customers the revolutionary Axion® technology as well as Tempering Water customer focused solutions. Our headquarters are located in Sparks, NV, USA. To serve them best, we are always close to our customers with our subsidiaries in Switzerland, Brazil and Singapore. As early as 1985, Haws AG opened in Switzerland to serve customers in Europe, the Middle East and Africa.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ANDRITZ Recycling

Stattegger Straße, Graz, AT
Last Update: 2025-11-27

As an innovative technology supplier, ANDRITZ has also been a reliable partner for the processing industry in the megatrend of recycling for many years. Beyond the market opportunities, ANDRITZ also sees its technological commitment in the field of recycling as a responsibility for greater sustainability and careful use of the limited resources that our planet offers us. ANDRITZ Recycling is a cooperation between several technology areas of the ANDRITZ Group, consisting of ANDRITZ Pulp & Paper, ANDRITZ Nonwoven & Textile, ANDRITZ Feed and Biofuel, and others. One focus of this channel is on the area of technologies for the reprocessing of textiles. The world of textiles and the textile industry should be under no illusions about their responsibilities. The price of fast fashion is that making clothes accounts for around 10 percent of CO₂ emissions from human activity. But despite the need for circularity in our use of resources, the clothing industry has been fed by a distinctly linear value chain. Clothing is notoriously over-supplied, and while it might be resold, recycled into cloths or insulation, much of it ends up incinerated or in landfill. Textile-to-textile circularity has been conspicuously absent. ANDRITZ technology can help to stop growing these mountains of waste.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/haws-ag.jpeg
Haws EMEA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/andritz-recycling.jpeg
ANDRITZ Recycling
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Haws EMEA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ANDRITZ Recycling
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Haws EMEA in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ANDRITZ Recycling in 2025.

Incident History — Haws EMEA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Haws EMEA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ANDRITZ Recycling (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ANDRITZ Recycling cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/haws-ag.jpeg
Haws EMEA
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/andritz-recycling.jpeg
ANDRITZ Recycling
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Haws EMEA company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ANDRITZ Recycling company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ANDRITZ Recycling company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Haws EMEA company.

In the current year, ANDRITZ Recycling company and Haws EMEA company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ANDRITZ Recycling company nor Haws EMEA company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ANDRITZ Recycling company nor Haws EMEA company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ANDRITZ Recycling company nor Haws EMEA company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Haws EMEA company nor ANDRITZ Recycling company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Haws EMEA nor ANDRITZ Recycling holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

ANDRITZ Recycling company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Haws EMEA company.

Haws EMEA company employs more people globally than ANDRITZ Recycling company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Haws EMEA nor ANDRITZ Recycling holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Haws EMEA nor ANDRITZ Recycling holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Haws EMEA nor ANDRITZ Recycling holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Haws EMEA nor ANDRITZ Recycling holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Haws EMEA nor ANDRITZ Recycling holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Haws EMEA nor ANDRITZ Recycling holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H