Comparison Overview

Hawley Troxell

VS

Edwards and Co Legal

Hawley Troxell

877 W Main Street, Boise, 83702, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Hawley Troxell is Idaho and the Inland Northwest's premier business law firm. With a deep pool of knowledge, a commitment to integrity, and a relentless spirit, we’ve been helping businesses put ideas into action since 1964. With 100+ attorneys in seven offices across Idaho and the Inland Northwest, we serve clients nationally and internationally across a variety of business areas and markets. Headquartered in Boise, we also have offices in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho Falls, Pocatello, Reno, and Yakima. When your business requires sophisticated legal advice, look to Hawley Troxell. And, best of all, our nationally renowned legal services come with a local address.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 149
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Edwards and Co Legal

Level 2, Paddington, NSW, 2021, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Edwards + Co is an Australian-based law firm providing legal solutions for a global, interconnected and knowledge-enabled world. We provide a broad range of corporate and commercial advice in Australia and across the Asia Pacific, with particular industry specialisation in media, digital, technology, communications and infrastructure. Our agile business model combines large law firm expertise with the pragmatism of hands on business experience to deliver nimble, value-driven services for clients. Edwards + Co Legal was founded with the belief that better and more affordable legal solutions can be achieved by stepping away from the traditional large law firm approach, thinking innovatively, truly understanding clients’ needs, employing principles of sustainability and taking advantage of modern technologies.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hawley-troxell.jpeg
Hawley Troxell
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hawley Troxell
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Edwards and Co Legal
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hawley Troxell in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Edwards and Co Legal in 2025.

Incident History — Hawley Troxell (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hawley Troxell cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Edwards and Co Legal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Edwards and Co Legal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hawley-troxell.jpeg
Hawley Troxell
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/edwards-co.jpeg
Edwards and Co Legal
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Hawley Troxell company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Edwards and Co Legal company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Edwards and Co Legal company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hawley Troxell company.

In the current year, Edwards and Co Legal company and Hawley Troxell company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Edwards and Co Legal company nor Hawley Troxell company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Edwards and Co Legal company nor Hawley Troxell company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Edwards and Co Legal company nor Hawley Troxell company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hawley Troxell company nor Edwards and Co Legal company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hawley Troxell nor Edwards and Co Legal holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Hawley Troxell company nor Edwards and Co Legal company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Hawley Troxell company employs more people globally than Edwards and Co Legal company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Hawley Troxell nor Edwards and Co Legal holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hawley Troxell nor Edwards and Co Legal holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hawley Troxell nor Edwards and Co Legal holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hawley Troxell nor Edwards and Co Legal holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hawley Troxell nor Edwards and Co Legal holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hawley Troxell nor Edwards and Co Legal holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X