Comparison Overview

Hawley Troxell

VS

Bull Son & Schmidt

Hawley Troxell

877 W Main Street, Boise, 83702, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Hawley Troxell is Idaho and the Inland Northwest's premier business law firm. With a deep pool of knowledge, a commitment to integrity, and a relentless spirit, we’ve been helping businesses put ideas into action since 1964. With 100+ attorneys in seven offices across Idaho and the Inland Northwest, we serve clients nationally and internationally across a variety of business areas and markets. Headquartered in Boise, we also have offices in Coeur d’Alene, Idaho Falls, Pocatello, Reno, and Yakima. When your business requires sophisticated legal advice, look to Hawley Troxell. And, best of all, our nationally renowned legal services come with a local address.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 149
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bull Son & Schmidt

No 1 Chandos St, St Leonards, 2065, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The provision of practical legal advice from lawyers you can understand at reasonable rates. Our team of solicitors have experience acting for a broad range of businesses and organisations, including private and public companies, councils, hospitals, insurers, accountants, liquidators, co-operatives, IT companies, industry associations, financial institutions, airlines,building and construction companies, publishers, transport companies,engineers and property developers. Our individual clients have diverse backgrounds, including builders, barristers, bishops, bus drivers, bank managers, shop owners, judges, adventurers, politicians, photographers, doctors, teachers, dentists, directors, mechanics, media personalities and "mums and dads". We can help you get your house (personal affairs) and businesses in order.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hawley-troxell.jpeg
Hawley Troxell
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Bull Son & Schmidt
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hawley Troxell
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bull Son & Schmidt
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hawley Troxell in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bull Son & Schmidt in 2025.

Incident History — Hawley Troxell (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hawley Troxell cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bull Son & Schmidt (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bull Son & Schmidt cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hawley-troxell.jpeg
Hawley Troxell
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Bull Son & Schmidt
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Bull Son & Schmidt company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Hawley Troxell company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Bull Son & Schmidt company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hawley Troxell company.

In the current year, Bull Son & Schmidt company and Hawley Troxell company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bull Son & Schmidt company nor Hawley Troxell company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bull Son & Schmidt company nor Hawley Troxell company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bull Son & Schmidt company nor Hawley Troxell company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hawley Troxell company nor Bull Son & Schmidt company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hawley Troxell nor Bull Son & Schmidt holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Hawley Troxell company nor Bull Son & Schmidt company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Hawley Troxell company employs more people globally than Bull Son & Schmidt company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Hawley Troxell nor Bull Son & Schmidt holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hawley Troxell nor Bull Son & Schmidt holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hawley Troxell nor Bull Son & Schmidt holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hawley Troxell nor Bull Son & Schmidt holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hawley Troxell nor Bull Son & Schmidt holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hawley Troxell nor Bull Son & Schmidt holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X