Comparison Overview

Haven Chicago

VS

Pan Intercultural Arts

Haven Chicago

1331 N Milwaukee Ave, Chicago, Illinois, 60622, US
Last Update: 2025-12-14
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.havenchi.org

We exist to be a Haven for The Future. We achieve this through championing the next generation of playwrights, directors and actors by producing and promoting plays and performances that are staking their claim as the immediate future of this art form, and by investing in those at the very beginning of their professional journeys. Through this inspiration, we seek to ignite in each audience member a hope for the Future - the Future of theatre and performance, the Future of each other, the Future of our community.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Pan Intercultural Arts

O'Donnell Court, Brunswick Centre, London, England, WC1N 1NX, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-14
Between 750 and 799
http://www.pan-arts.net

Pan is an intercultural arts organisation dedicated to the exploration of cultural diversity through the arts and how such work can inspire and implement social change. This is achieved through workshops and performances with young people who are marginalised and at risk of social exclusion. Pan helps its participants find a voice through drama, dance, music, writing and film. We work with people from all cultures and religions to encourage a world where we respect and understand each others'​ lives, discovering the possibilities of our rich diversity.

NAICS: 711
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/haven-theatre-company.jpeg
Haven Chicago
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pan-intercultural-arts-limited.jpeg
Pan Intercultural Arts
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Haven Chicago
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pan Intercultural Arts
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Haven Chicago in 2025.

Incidents vs Performing Arts Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pan Intercultural Arts in 2025.

Incident History — Haven Chicago (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Haven Chicago cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pan Intercultural Arts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pan Intercultural Arts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/haven-theatre-company.jpeg
Haven Chicago
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pan-intercultural-arts-limited.jpeg
Pan Intercultural Arts
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Haven Chicago company and Pan Intercultural Arts company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Pan Intercultural Arts company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Haven Chicago company.

In the current year, Pan Intercultural Arts company and Haven Chicago company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Pan Intercultural Arts company nor Haven Chicago company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Pan Intercultural Arts company nor Haven Chicago company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Pan Intercultural Arts company nor Haven Chicago company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Haven Chicago company nor Pan Intercultural Arts company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Haven Chicago nor Pan Intercultural Arts holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Haven Chicago company nor Pan Intercultural Arts company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Pan Intercultural Arts company employs more people globally than Haven Chicago company, reflecting its scale as a Performing Arts.

Neither Haven Chicago nor Pan Intercultural Arts holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Haven Chicago nor Pan Intercultural Arts holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Haven Chicago nor Pan Intercultural Arts holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Haven Chicago nor Pan Intercultural Arts holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Haven Chicago nor Pan Intercultural Arts holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Haven Chicago nor Pan Intercultural Arts holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References