Comparison Overview

Haven Recovery

VS

Child Welfare Information Gateway

Haven Recovery

None, None, St. Louis, Missouri, US, None
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Innovative recovery housing provider located in St. Louis, Missouri. As the first accredited housing organization in our region, Haven is a leader is evidence-based, quality recovery programming across a continuum of housing options. We offer: respite housing, recuperative care settings, and recovery housing. Haven recognizes and supports all pathways to recovery. Haven offers case management, recovery supports, counseling, and workforce training opportunities to those we serve. Haven also provides trainings for organizations across the country on recovery housing models and peer recovery focused services in partnership with the Center for Program Development. We offer comfortable, furnished homes with live-in housing managers, support meetings and resource assistance for treatment and employment connections. We hope residents build the skills necessary to continue succeeding outside of our community when the time is right for them.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Child Welfare Information Gateway

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27

A service of the Children's Bureau, Child Welfare Information Gateway connects child welfare, adoption, and related professionals to resources on child welfare, child abuse and neglect, out-of-home care, adoption, and more. We aim to promote the safety, permanency, and well-being of children, youth, and families through access to print and electronic publications, websites, databases, and online learning tools that improve child welfare practice and can be shared with families. Get our email updates to stay current on the latest news, research, and best practices in child welfare: https://www.childwelfare.gov/news-events/subscriptions/

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
4

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/haven-recovery.jpeg
Haven Recovery
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/child-welfare-information-gateway.jpeg
Child Welfare Information Gateway
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Haven Recovery
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Child Welfare Information Gateway
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Haven Recovery in 2025.

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Child Welfare Information Gateway in 2025.

Incident History — Haven Recovery (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Haven Recovery cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Child Welfare Information Gateway (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Child Welfare Information Gateway cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/haven-recovery.jpeg
Haven Recovery
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/child-welfare-information-gateway.jpeg
Child Welfare Information Gateway
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Spearphishing campaigns, Remote Monitoring & Management software exploitation, Multifactor authentication bombing, SIM swapping techniques
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Network Infiltration
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2023
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Child Welfare Information Gateway company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Haven Recovery company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Child Welfare Information Gateway company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Haven Recovery company has not reported any.

In the current year, Child Welfare Information Gateway company has reported more cyber incidents than Haven Recovery company.

Child Welfare Information Gateway company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Haven Recovery company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Child Welfare Information Gateway company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Haven Recovery company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Child Welfare Information Gateway company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Haven Recovery company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Haven Recovery company nor Child Welfare Information Gateway company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Haven Recovery nor Child Welfare Information Gateway holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Child Welfare Information Gateway company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Haven Recovery company.

Neither Haven Recovery nor Child Welfare Information Gateway holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Haven Recovery nor Child Welfare Information Gateway holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Haven Recovery nor Child Welfare Information Gateway holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Haven Recovery nor Child Welfare Information Gateway holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Haven Recovery nor Child Welfare Information Gateway holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Haven Recovery nor Child Welfare Information Gateway holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H