Comparison Overview

HAUS Recovery

VS

Middle Peninsula Northern Neck Community Services Board

HAUS Recovery

2420 Pearl St, Santa Monica, California, 90405, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.HAUSrecovery.com

At HAUS Recovery, we invite individuals facing substance use and co-occurring disorders to embark on a journey to wellness and wholeness. Our 10-bed structured living home is located in the vibrant and upscale beach community of Santa Monica, California. Our emphasis on staying focused, maintaining a positive attitude, caring for oneself and others, and finding enjoyment in nature creates a sobriety roadmap that enables individuals to attain their full recovery potential.

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Middle Peninsula Northern Neck Community Services Board

9228 George Washington Memorial Hwy, Gloucester, VA, 23061, US
Last Update: 2025-11-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mpnncsb.org

The Middle Peninsula Northern Neck Community Services Board is a public, nonprofit organization providing services to meet the needs of individuals and their families who have problems associated with mental health, intellectual disabilities, substance abuse, and developmental disabilities. Services are provided to residents in the Middle Peninsula and Northern Neck, VA. This area includes the counties of Westmoreland, Richmond, Essex, Northumberland, Lancaster, Gloucester, Mathews, Middlesex King & Queen and King William. It also includes the Town of Colonial Beach and West Point. Discovering possibilities....Changing lives There are multiple openings to work for this dynamic organization with excellent benefits...just go to www.mpnncsb.org/employment to complete an application for a therapist, regional coordinator, psychiatrist among others today!

NAICS: 621
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 93
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hausrecovery.jpeg
HAUS Recovery
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/middle-peninsula---northern-neck-community-services-board.jpeg
Middle Peninsula Northern Neck Community Services Board
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
HAUS Recovery
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Middle Peninsula Northern Neck Community Services Board
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HAUS Recovery in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Middle Peninsula Northern Neck Community Services Board in 2026.

Incident History — HAUS Recovery (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HAUS Recovery cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Middle Peninsula Northern Neck Community Services Board (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Middle Peninsula Northern Neck Community Services Board cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hausrecovery.jpeg
HAUS Recovery
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/middle-peninsula---northern-neck-community-services-board.jpeg
Middle Peninsula Northern Neck Community Services Board
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Middle Peninsula Northern Neck Community Services Board company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to HAUS Recovery company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Middle Peninsula Northern Neck Community Services Board company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to HAUS Recovery company.

In the current year, Middle Peninsula Northern Neck Community Services Board company and HAUS Recovery company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Middle Peninsula Northern Neck Community Services Board company nor HAUS Recovery company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Middle Peninsula Northern Neck Community Services Board company nor HAUS Recovery company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Middle Peninsula Northern Neck Community Services Board company nor HAUS Recovery company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither HAUS Recovery company nor Middle Peninsula Northern Neck Community Services Board company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither HAUS Recovery nor Middle Peninsula Northern Neck Community Services Board holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither HAUS Recovery company nor Middle Peninsula Northern Neck Community Services Board company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Middle Peninsula Northern Neck Community Services Board company employs more people globally than HAUS Recovery company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither HAUS Recovery nor Middle Peninsula Northern Neck Community Services Board holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither HAUS Recovery nor Middle Peninsula Northern Neck Community Services Board holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither HAUS Recovery nor Middle Peninsula Northern Neck Community Services Board holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither HAUS Recovery nor Middle Peninsula Northern Neck Community Services Board holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither HAUS Recovery nor Middle Peninsula Northern Neck Community Services Board holds HIPAA certification.

Neither HAUS Recovery nor Middle Peninsula Northern Neck Community Services Board holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

SummaryA command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) has been found to exist in the `wrangler pages deploy` command. The issue occurs because the `--commit-hash` parameter is passed directly to a shell command without proper validation or sanitization, allowing an attacker with control of `--commit-hash` to execute arbitrary commands on the system running Wrangler. Root causeThe commitHash variable, derived from user input via the --commit-hash CLI argument, is interpolated directly into a shell command using template literals (e.g.,  execSync(`git show -s --format=%B ${commitHash}`)). Shell metacharacters are interpreted by the shell, enabling command execution. ImpactThis vulnerability is generally hard to exploit, as it requires --commit-hash to be attacker controlled. The vulnerability primarily affects CI/CD environments where `wrangler pages deploy` is used in automated pipelines and the --commit-hash parameter is populated from external, potentially untrusted sources. An attacker could exploit this to: * Run any shell command. * Exfiltrate environment variables. * Compromise the CI runner to install backdoors or modify build artifacts. Credits Disclosed responsibly by kny4hacker. Mitigation * Wrangler v4 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v4.59.1 or higher. * Wrangler v3 users are requested to upgrade to Wrangler v3.114.17 or higher. * Users on Wrangler v2 (EOL) should upgrade to a supported major version.

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized creation, deletion or modification access to critical data or all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data as well as unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle VM VirtualBox accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L).

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
References
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Vulnerability in the Oracle VM VirtualBox product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Core). Supported versions that are affected are 7.1.14 and 7.2.4. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows high privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Oracle VM VirtualBox executes to compromise Oracle VM VirtualBox. While the vulnerability is in Oracle VM VirtualBox, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle VM VirtualBox. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.2 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

Published
Date
2026-01-20
Updated
Date
2026-01-20
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References