Comparison Overview

Hatch & Kirk, Inc.

VS

Gradall Railroad Maintenance

Hatch & Kirk, Inc.

927 NW 50th St, Seattle, Washington, US, 98107
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Hatch & Kirk Inc. is an AAR M-1003 certified global leader in the manufacture, remanufacture, sale and distribution of engines and aftermarket diesel engine parts for EMD, ALCO, Fairbanks-Morse and Cleveland brand engines. Established in 1945, we have spent the past 70 years building and maintaining one of the strongest reputations in the industry for delivery, quality, competitive pricing and outstanding customer service. H&K is so confident in our product that we offer an industry-leading two-year warranty on all of our engines and engine parts.

NAICS: 3365
NAICS Definition: Railroad Rolling Stock Manufacturing
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Gradall Railroad Maintenance

406 Mill Ave SW, New Philadelphia, 44663, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

Gradall is an innovative manufacturer of railroad track maintenance equipment. Choices in wheeled undercarriages and rail gear options provide the mobility needed to get the work done quickly. Gradall’s world-renowned telescoping, tilting boom with an array of MOW attachments can handle everything from rail and tie repairs to cleaning up landslides, vegetation control and crossing repairs. And the low-profile boom keeps you working efficiently even under bridges and in tunnels. The new Rapid Drive option allows you to travel at speeds up to 25 mph, both forward and backward. The upper cab switch allows the operator to select the standard remote drive for speeds up to 5 mph, or the new Rapid Drive system for faster travel when the boom is parallel with the tracks. The Gradall brand is known worldwide for innovation and versatility, producing unique infrastructure construction and maintenance machines for governments and contractors. Gradall Industries, Inc., an Alamo Group company, maintains all Gradall design, manufacturing, sales, product development and support activities in New Philadelphia, Ohio. As a result, the Gradall excavator is the only excavator produced only in America. While Gradall Industries maintains a global network of machine distributors, the Ohio location provides a distinct advantage for equipment owners in North America who rely on factory-based product information and support.

NAICS: 3365
NAICS Definition: Railroad Rolling Stock Manufacturing
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hatch-&-kirk-inc..jpeg
Hatch & Kirk, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gradall-railroad-maintenance.jpeg
Gradall Railroad Maintenance
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hatch & Kirk, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Gradall Railroad Maintenance
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hatch & Kirk, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gradall Railroad Maintenance in 2025.

Incident History — Hatch & Kirk, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hatch & Kirk, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Gradall Railroad Maintenance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gradall Railroad Maintenance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hatch-&-kirk-inc..jpeg
Hatch & Kirk, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gradall-railroad-maintenance.jpeg
Gradall Railroad Maintenance
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Gradall Railroad Maintenance company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Hatch & Kirk, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Gradall Railroad Maintenance company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hatch & Kirk, Inc. company.

In the current year, Gradall Railroad Maintenance company and Hatch & Kirk, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Gradall Railroad Maintenance company nor Hatch & Kirk, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Gradall Railroad Maintenance company nor Hatch & Kirk, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Gradall Railroad Maintenance company nor Hatch & Kirk, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hatch & Kirk, Inc. company nor Gradall Railroad Maintenance company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hatch & Kirk, Inc. nor Gradall Railroad Maintenance holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Gradall Railroad Maintenance company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Hatch & Kirk, Inc. company.

Neither Hatch & Kirk, Inc. nor Gradall Railroad Maintenance holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hatch & Kirk, Inc. nor Gradall Railroad Maintenance holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hatch & Kirk, Inc. nor Gradall Railroad Maintenance holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hatch & Kirk, Inc. nor Gradall Railroad Maintenance holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hatch & Kirk, Inc. nor Gradall Railroad Maintenance holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hatch & Kirk, Inc. nor Gradall Railroad Maintenance holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H