Comparison Overview

HAT Collective

VS

2010 Office Furniture Inc.

HAT Collective

100 Kuebler Rd, Easton, Pennsylvania, 18040, US
Last Update: 2025-11-25

At HAT Collective, we’re empowering individualization in the workplace. We believe the power to choose improves satisfaction, health, and productivity. Our products showcase craftsmanship and design innovation, enabling you to create your ideal workspace. Whether in the office or at home, sitting or standing, together or at a distance, our sophisticated range of workplace solutions lets you work your way. Our brand is committed to quality and affordability, with an emphasis on customer service and exceptional levels of support for our network of dealers. It’s easy to do business with HAT Collective.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 34
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

2010 Office Furniture Inc.

2227 N Merced Ave., South El Monte, CA, 91733, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

At 2010 Office Furniture, not only are we passionate about sourcing the highest quality office furniture, but we make sure our clients receive exceptional services that are exemplary and first rate. We have worked hard to build close relationships with all the leading furniture manufacturers, allowing us to combine their experience and expertise along with our own. Our team of highly qualified specialists collectively has over 45 years of experience, and are well acquainted with servicing some of the top, most distinguished business companies in Southern California. In addition, our strong ties to modern aesthetics, as well as our dedication to good interior design, ensure our clients that their project end-result is nothing short of sublime

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hat-contract.jpeg
HAT Collective
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/2010-office-furniture.jpeg
2010 Office Furniture Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
HAT Collective
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
2010 Office Furniture Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for HAT Collective in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 2010 Office Furniture Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — HAT Collective (X = Date, Y = Severity)

HAT Collective cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — 2010 Office Furniture Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

2010 Office Furniture Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hat-contract.jpeg
HAT Collective
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/2010-office-furniture.jpeg
2010 Office Furniture Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

2010 Office Furniture Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to HAT Collective company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, 2010 Office Furniture Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to HAT Collective company.

In the current year, 2010 Office Furniture Inc. company and HAT Collective company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither 2010 Office Furniture Inc. company nor HAT Collective company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither 2010 Office Furniture Inc. company nor HAT Collective company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither 2010 Office Furniture Inc. company nor HAT Collective company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither HAT Collective company nor 2010 Office Furniture Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither HAT Collective nor 2010 Office Furniture Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

HAT Collective company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to 2010 Office Furniture Inc. company.

HAT Collective company employs more people globally than 2010 Office Furniture Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither HAT Collective nor 2010 Office Furniture Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither HAT Collective nor 2010 Office Furniture Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither HAT Collective nor 2010 Office Furniture Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither HAT Collective nor 2010 Office Furniture Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither HAT Collective nor 2010 Office Furniture Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither HAT Collective nor 2010 Office Furniture Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.