Comparison Overview

Hassig Print & Design

VS

MR Label Company

Hassig Print & Design

40817 Garfield Rd, Clinton Township, Michigan, 48038, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Hassig Print & Design is family owned & operated and is the business for businesses. We help small businesses build, brand and grow. We service a variety of industries and have a reputation for exceptional price points and quality of products and service that is next to none. Hassig Print & Design is a modern company that focuses on efficiency and quality. We go to work for our customers and find them exactly what they need and exceed their expectations. We're proud to be a Shopify Partner offering our clients cutting web designs with the industries top performing business solution. Here are our core services that we can offer you: - Graphic Design Services - Full Color Digital Printing - Shopify e-Commerce Website Design - MailChimp Email Marketing

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

MR Label Company

5018 Gray Road, Cincinnati, 45232, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1976, MR Label is a family-owned business which has grown from a one-room office into our current facility with over 19,000 square feet. MR Label specializes in producing custom, made-to-order, pressure sensitive labels, decals and tags. We have flexographic, screen, digital, and variable printing capabilities. We also offer a full in-house, pre-press department with complete Macintosh desktop publishing, image-setting, and plate-making services.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hassig-print-&-design.jpeg
Hassig Print & Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mr-label-company.jpeg
MR Label Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hassig Print & Design
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MR Label Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hassig Print & Design in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MR Label Company in 2025.

Incident History — Hassig Print & Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hassig Print & Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MR Label Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MR Label Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hassig-print-&-design.jpeg
Hassig Print & Design
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mr-label-company.jpeg
MR Label Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Hassig Print & Design company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to MR Label Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, MR Label Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hassig Print & Design company.

In the current year, MR Label Company company and Hassig Print & Design company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither MR Label Company company nor Hassig Print & Design company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither MR Label Company company nor Hassig Print & Design company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither MR Label Company company nor Hassig Print & Design company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hassig Print & Design company nor MR Label Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hassig Print & Design nor MR Label Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Hassig Print & Design company nor MR Label Company company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

MR Label Company company employs more people globally than Hassig Print & Design company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Hassig Print & Design nor MR Label Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hassig Print & Design nor MR Label Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hassig Print & Design nor MR Label Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hassig Print & Design nor MR Label Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hassig Print & Design nor MR Label Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hassig Print & Design nor MR Label Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N