Comparison Overview

Harvard Law Review

VS

William McCoy Publishers

Harvard Law Review

1511 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

The Harvard Law Review is a student-run organization whose primary purpose is to publish a journal of legal scholarship. The Review comes out monthly from November through June and has roughly 2,500 pages per volume. The organization is formally independent of the Harvard Law School. Student editors make all editorial and organizational decisions and, together with a professional business staff of three, carry out day-to-day operations.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 81
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

William McCoy Publishers

P.O. Box 473181-3181 Charlotte, NC 28247, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

“I am a pool shootin' boy. My name is Willie McCoy, but down home they call me Slim.” The year was 1972; the singer was Jim Croce; and the refrain was “You don't tug on Superman's cape. You don't spit into the wind. You don't pull the mask off the Ol' Lone Ranger and you don't mess around with Slim.” The year was 1982; the employer was T.J. Maxx; and my first workplace nickname was “Slim.” The mathematical Transitive Property of Equality states: “If a = b and b = c, then a = c.” If Willie McCoy = Slim and Slim = me, then Willie McCoy = me and thus William McCoy Publishers was developed and three non-fictions books were published in print and digital form on Amazon.com: 1. GOD-centric (2011) fulfilled a lifelong mission to rescue my good and fair God of love from religions which did not portray God as always loving, good, and fair. 2. GOD-centric Interior Spiritual Disciplines (2012) put into practice the filtering of sacred texts and verse through the loving, good, and fair lens. 3. GOOD-centric Exterior Spiritual Disciplines (2016) focused on our living out our ultimate concerns of love, goodness, and fairness through the disciplines of simplicity, service, stewardship, and celebration. Thank you for reading!

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/harvard-law-review.jpeg
Harvard Law Review
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/william-mccoy-publishers.jpeg
William McCoy Publishers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Harvard Law Review
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
William McCoy Publishers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Harvard Law Review in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for William McCoy Publishers in 2025.

Incident History — Harvard Law Review (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Harvard Law Review cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — William McCoy Publishers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

William McCoy Publishers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/harvard-law-review.jpeg
Harvard Law Review
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/william-mccoy-publishers.jpeg
William McCoy Publishers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

William McCoy Publishers company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Harvard Law Review company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, William McCoy Publishers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Harvard Law Review company.

In the current year, William McCoy Publishers company and Harvard Law Review company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither William McCoy Publishers company nor Harvard Law Review company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither William McCoy Publishers company nor Harvard Law Review company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither William McCoy Publishers company nor Harvard Law Review company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Harvard Law Review company nor William McCoy Publishers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Harvard Law Review nor William McCoy Publishers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Harvard Law Review company nor William McCoy Publishers company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Harvard Law Review company employs more people globally than William McCoy Publishers company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Harvard Law Review nor William McCoy Publishers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Harvard Law Review nor William McCoy Publishers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Harvard Law Review nor William McCoy Publishers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Harvard Law Review nor William McCoy Publishers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Harvard Law Review nor William McCoy Publishers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Harvard Law Review nor William McCoy Publishers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.