Comparison Overview

Harvard Law Review

VS

Red Wheel/Weiser

Harvard Law Review

1511 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.harvardlawreview.org

The Harvard Law Review is a student-run organization whose primary purpose is to publish a journal of legal scholarship. The Review comes out monthly from November through June and has roughly 2,500 pages per volume. The organization is formally independent of the Harvard Law School. Student editors make all editorial and organizational decisions and, together with a professional business staff of three, carry out day-to-day operations.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 81
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Red Wheel/Weiser

None
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799
http://redwheelweiser.com

Why Red Wheel? We found the red wheel to be an apt symbol for what we're trying to do. Wheels get you places, move you forward. They're a symbol of both motion and wholeness in just about every culture or religious belief system. Red is, of course, the color of passion and life. We hope—and believe—people will find comfort, inspiration, passion, and answers through our books. Weiser Books has a long history as publishers of esoteric, occult teachings from traditions all around the world and throughout time. Metaphysics and magick, astrology, tarot, Eastern thought, Western mystery traditions. New consciousness, received wisdom, information about how to live now in these changing times. Many of our readers remember the Weiser Bookstore in New York City—a gathering place, a place to discover new ways of looking at and being in the world. From that bookstore, begun by Samuel Weiser in 1926 and specializing in esoteric spirituality, arose the Weiser Books publishing program, begun by Donald Weiser, first to reprint out-of-print classics and then to publish new materials. We publish books for spiritual seekers and students from all walks of life and at all points on the path. Our books are available wherever books and ebooks are sold and are available to purchase through our site. Please check our full collection at http://redwheelweiser.com. Michael Kerber, President & CEO, Red Wheel/Weiser Jan Johnson, Publisher Emerita, Red Wheel/Weiser

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/harvard-law-review.jpeg
Harvard Law Review
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/red-wheel-weiser.jpeg
Red Wheel/Weiser
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Harvard Law Review
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Red Wheel/Weiser
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Harvard Law Review in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Red Wheel/Weiser in 2025.

Incident History — Harvard Law Review (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Harvard Law Review cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Red Wheel/Weiser (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Red Wheel/Weiser cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/harvard-law-review.jpeg
Harvard Law Review
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/red-wheel-weiser.jpeg
Red Wheel/Weiser
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Harvard Law Review company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Red Wheel/Weiser company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Red Wheel/Weiser company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Harvard Law Review company.

In the current year, Red Wheel/Weiser company and Harvard Law Review company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Red Wheel/Weiser company nor Harvard Law Review company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Red Wheel/Weiser company nor Harvard Law Review company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Red Wheel/Weiser company nor Harvard Law Review company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Harvard Law Review company nor Red Wheel/Weiser company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Harvard Law Review nor Red Wheel/Weiser holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Harvard Law Review company nor Red Wheel/Weiser company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Harvard Law Review company employs more people globally than Red Wheel/Weiser company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Harvard Law Review nor Red Wheel/Weiser holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Harvard Law Review nor Red Wheel/Weiser holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Harvard Law Review nor Red Wheel/Weiser holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Harvard Law Review nor Red Wheel/Weiser holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Harvard Law Review nor Red Wheel/Weiser holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Harvard Law Review nor Red Wheel/Weiser holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References