Comparison Overview

Haruki

VS

Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control

Haruki

Kaiser-Wilhelm-Straße 115, Hamburg, DE, 20355
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

We are architects of business and innovation. Haruki helps companies to pick up and shape changes in society, technology and culture. OBSERVE: We connect exploratory trend research and methods of qualitative and quantitative market research. UNDERSTAND: We help our clients to understand the meaning of transformation and to make it work within their company. DO: We help our clients to integrate the insights in their innovation process or daily business.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control

1701 K Street NW, Suite 805, Washington, DC, US, 20006
Last Update: 2025-12-01

The Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control conducts research and advocacy to stem the spread of nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction. The Wisconsin Project is a private, non-profit, non-partisan organization in Washington, D.C. founded in cooperation with the University of Wisconsin. The organization’s work is guided by the idea that the best way to stop the proliferation of mass destruction weapons is to do so at the source: to cut off the supply of material, equipment and technology needed to make these weapons. To that end, the Project uncovers and publicizes dangerous export transactions and works directly with countries to improve their export control systems. The Wisconsin Project was established in 1986 by now-Emeritus Professor Gary Milhollin. Ms. Valerie Lincy, who joined the Project in 2003, was named Executive Director in 2012. As a result of the Project’s research and revelations in the press, Israel was forced to return nuclear material it had imported for improper purposes from Norway, Germany overhauled and strengthened its export control system, the U.S. Congress tightened restrictions on the sale of American supercomputers, and the U.S. Commerce Department restricted trade with 63 organizations in Pakistan and India following those countries’ nuclear weapon tests. The United States, the United Nations and the European Union also used the Project’s research to identify Iranian entities linked to nuclear and missile work whose assets should be frozen. The Project has also provided direct assistance to U.S. and foreign government agencies to help them improve their export controls. In cooperation with the U.S. Defense and State Departments, the Project has trained thousands of export control officials in some 40 countries around the world. This initiative began in 1998, with countries in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. It since has expanded to include countries in Africa, Latin America, the Middle East, and Southeast Asia, including countries of concern for transshipment and diversion. The Risk Report database and the Iran Watch website (iranwatch.org) are the Wisconsin Project’s two principal programs. The Risk Report is a leading source of unclassified information on companies around the world suspected of links to weapons of mass destruction programs or to terrorism. The Risk Report is a subscription database first produced in 1995 that is used by governments for end use screening, risk management, and investigations, and by companies for supply chain and transaction screening. Iran Watch is a comprehensive web site that tracks Iran’s ability to construct nuclear and chemical weapons and the missiles to deliver them. Iran Watch was launched in 2004 and contains thousands of pages of official documents about Iran’s WMD programs, as well as analysis by the Wisconsin Project. The Wisconsin Project receives support through grants from the U.S. government and private foundations.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/haruki.jpeg
Haruki
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wisconsin-project-on-nuclear-arms-control.jpeg
Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Haruki
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Haruki in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control in 2025.

Incident History — Haruki (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Haruki cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/haruki.jpeg
Haruki
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/wisconsin-project-on-nuclear-arms-control.jpeg
Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Haruki company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Haruki company.

In the current year, Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control company and Haruki company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control company nor Haruki company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control company nor Haruki company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control company nor Haruki company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Haruki company nor Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Haruki nor Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Haruki company nor Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Haruki company employs more people globally than Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Haruki nor Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Haruki nor Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Haruki nor Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Haruki nor Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Haruki nor Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Haruki nor Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Sigstore Timestamp Authority is a service for issuing RFC 3161 timestamps. Prior to 2.0.3, Function api.ParseJSONRequest currently splits (via a call to strings.Split) an optionally-provided OID (which is untrusted data) on periods. Similarly, function api.getContentType splits the Content-Type header (which is also untrusted data) on an application string. As a result, in the face of a malicious request with either an excessively long OID in the payload containing many period characters or a malformed Content-Type header, a call to api.ParseJSONRequest or api.getContentType incurs allocations of O(n) bytes (where n stands for the length of the function's argument). This vulnerability is fixed in 2.0.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Monkeytype is a minimalistic and customizable typing test. In 25.49.0 and earlier, there is improper handling of user input which allows an attacker to execute malicious javascript on anyone viewing a malicious quote submission. quote.text and quote.source are user input, and they're inserted straight into the DOM. If they contain HTML tags, they will be rendered (after some escaping using quotes and textarea tags).

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

SysReptor is a fully customizable pentest reporting platform. Prior to 2025.102, there is a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability allows authenticated users to execute malicious JavaScript in the context of other logged-in users by uploading malicious JavaScript files in the web UI. This vulnerability is fixed in 2025.102.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Taiko Alethia is an Ethereum-equivalent, permissionless, based rollup designed to scale Ethereum without compromising its fundamental properties. In 2.3.1 and earlier, TaikoInbox._verifyBatches (packages/protocol/contracts/layer1/based/TaikoInbox.sol:627-678) advanced the local tid to whatever transition matched the current blockHash before knowing whether that batch would actually be verified. When the loop later broke (e.g., cooldown window not yet passed or transition invalidated), the function still wrote that newer tid into batches[lastVerifiedBatchId].verifiedTransitionId after decrementing batchId. Result: the last verified batch could end up pointing at a transition index from the next batch (often zeroed), corrupting the verified chain pointer.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A flaw has been found in youlaitech youlai-mall 1.0.0/2.0.0. Affected is the function getById/updateAddress/deleteAddress of the file /mall-ums/app-api/v1/addresses/. Executing manipulation can lead to improper control of dynamically-identified variables. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X