Comparison Overview

Hart Law Office, PLLC

VS

Law Offices of Eric K Chen

Hart Law Office, PLLC

55407, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Hart Law Office, PLLC is a full-service immigration law firm based in Minneapolis, Minnesota and serving clients throughout the United States and the world. Hart Law Office is built on the twin pillars of excellence in the practice of law and compassion toward clients. The complexity of immigration law demands a high level of legal expertise. At the same time, the stakes involved in immigration cases - including family unity - require sensitivity to clients’ needs as individuals. Hart Law Office can assist you with all aspects of immigration law, including: * Asylum * Family reunification * Employment-based immigration * Applications based on domestic abuse and crime * Release from ICE custody and defense against deportation Hart Law Office brings special experience and passion to cases involving I-601 hardship waivers for spouses of U.S. citizens.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Law Offices of Eric K Chen

6330 Spring Mountain Rd. Ste. D, LAS VEGAS, Nevada 89146, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

The Law Offices of Eric K. Chen is a professional corporation headquartered in Las Vegas, Nevada with an additional location in City of Industry, California. Established in 1994 and licensed to practice in both Nevada and California, the Law Offices of Eric K. Chen provides a wide array of legal services such as consultations, planning and future preparation, legal representation, and much more. Specializing in personal injury, immigration, estate planning, business, and family law, our experienced staff is available 24 hours a day/7 days a week and is able to communicate in English, Mandarin, Cantonese, and Spanish

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Hart Law Office, PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/law-offices-of-eric-k-chen.jpeg
Law Offices of Eric K Chen
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hart Law Office, PLLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Law Offices of Eric K Chen
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hart Law Office, PLLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Law Offices of Eric K Chen in 2025.

Incident History — Hart Law Office, PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hart Law Office, PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Law Offices of Eric K Chen (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Law Offices of Eric K Chen cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Hart Law Office, PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/law-offices-of-eric-k-chen.jpeg
Law Offices of Eric K Chen
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Hart Law Office, PLLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Law Offices of Eric K Chen company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Law Offices of Eric K Chen company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hart Law Office, PLLC company.

In the current year, Law Offices of Eric K Chen company and Hart Law Office, PLLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Law Offices of Eric K Chen company nor Hart Law Office, PLLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Law Offices of Eric K Chen company nor Hart Law Office, PLLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Law Offices of Eric K Chen company nor Hart Law Office, PLLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hart Law Office, PLLC company nor Law Offices of Eric K Chen company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hart Law Office, PLLC nor Law Offices of Eric K Chen holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Hart Law Office, PLLC company nor Law Offices of Eric K Chen company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Law Offices of Eric K Chen company employs more people globally than Hart Law Office, PLLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Hart Law Office, PLLC nor Law Offices of Eric K Chen holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hart Law Office, PLLC nor Law Offices of Eric K Chen holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hart Law Office, PLLC nor Law Offices of Eric K Chen holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hart Law Office, PLLC nor Law Offices of Eric K Chen holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hart Law Office, PLLC nor Law Offices of Eric K Chen holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hart Law Office, PLLC nor Law Offices of Eric K Chen holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X