Comparison Overview

Hart Law Office, PLLC

VS

Chambless, Higdon, Richardson, Katz and Griggs, LLP

Hart Law Office, PLLC

55407, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Hart Law Office, PLLC is a full-service immigration law firm based in Minneapolis, Minnesota and serving clients throughout the United States and the world. Hart Law Office is built on the twin pillars of excellence in the practice of law and compassion toward clients. The complexity of immigration law demands a high level of legal expertise. At the same time, the stakes involved in immigration cases - including family unity - require sensitivity to clients’ needs as individuals. Hart Law Office can assist you with all aspects of immigration law, including: * Asylum * Family reunification * Employment-based immigration * Applications based on domestic abuse and crime * Release from ICE custody and defense against deportation Hart Law Office brings special experience and passion to cases involving I-601 hardship waivers for spouses of U.S. citizens.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Chambless, Higdon, Richardson, Katz and Griggs, LLP

3920 Arkwright Road, Macon, GA, 31210, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

REGIONAL ROOTS. STATEWIDE REACH. LEADERS IN LITIGATION The law firm of Chambless, Higdon, Richardson, Katz & Griggs, LLP assists clients in reaching their goals by providing the highest quality legal services in a responsive and cost-effective manner. Founded as a litigation firm in 1988, Chambless, Higdon, Richardson, Katz & Griggs LLP has the practice expertise to provide specialized legal services in a variety of areas including Workers' Compensation, Governmental Liability, Medical Malpractice, Employment Law, Business Litigation and Counseling, Personal Injury, Civil and Tort Litigation and some Criminal Law.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 44
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Hart Law Office, PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chambless-higdon-richardson-katz-and-griggs-llp.jpeg
Chambless, Higdon, Richardson, Katz and Griggs, LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hart Law Office, PLLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Chambless, Higdon, Richardson, Katz and Griggs, LLP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hart Law Office, PLLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chambless, Higdon, Richardson, Katz and Griggs, LLP in 2025.

Incident History — Hart Law Office, PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hart Law Office, PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Chambless, Higdon, Richardson, Katz and Griggs, LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chambless, Higdon, Richardson, Katz and Griggs, LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Hart Law Office, PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/chambless-higdon-richardson-katz-and-griggs-llp.jpeg
Chambless, Higdon, Richardson, Katz and Griggs, LLP
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Hart Law Office, PLLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Chambless, Higdon, Richardson, Katz and Griggs, LLP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Chambless, Higdon, Richardson, Katz and Griggs, LLP company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hart Law Office, PLLC company.

In the current year, Chambless, Higdon, Richardson, Katz and Griggs, LLP company and Hart Law Office, PLLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Chambless, Higdon, Richardson, Katz and Griggs, LLP company nor Hart Law Office, PLLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Chambless, Higdon, Richardson, Katz and Griggs, LLP company nor Hart Law Office, PLLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Chambless, Higdon, Richardson, Katz and Griggs, LLP company nor Hart Law Office, PLLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hart Law Office, PLLC company nor Chambless, Higdon, Richardson, Katz and Griggs, LLP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hart Law Office, PLLC nor Chambless, Higdon, Richardson, Katz and Griggs, LLP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Hart Law Office, PLLC company nor Chambless, Higdon, Richardson, Katz and Griggs, LLP company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Chambless, Higdon, Richardson, Katz and Griggs, LLP company employs more people globally than Hart Law Office, PLLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Hart Law Office, PLLC nor Chambless, Higdon, Richardson, Katz and Griggs, LLP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hart Law Office, PLLC nor Chambless, Higdon, Richardson, Katz and Griggs, LLP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hart Law Office, PLLC nor Chambless, Higdon, Richardson, Katz and Griggs, LLP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hart Law Office, PLLC nor Chambless, Higdon, Richardson, Katz and Griggs, LLP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hart Law Office, PLLC nor Chambless, Higdon, Richardson, Katz and Griggs, LLP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hart Law Office, PLLC nor Chambless, Higdon, Richardson, Katz and Griggs, LLP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X