Comparison Overview

Harrison Regional Chamber of Commerce

VS

City of Tampa

Harrison Regional Chamber of Commerce

621 East Rush Ave, Harrison, Arkansas, 72601, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12

Harrison is a thriving small city, marrying a historic manufacturing tradition – with 8 global manufactures among its 14, and 7 of those 8 have their global headquarters locally – and a strong education heritage into an attractive location for growing a business, a community, a lifestyle. Industry came to Harrison with the railroads in the late 19th century, and it remains one of the strongest business centers in Arkansas today, with more than 5,000 of its workforce employed in one of the city’s 30-plus prime business operations. Those operations produce and deliver diversified products and services, everything from automobile engine parts to commercial trailer flooring to folding cartons to plastic injection molding to communications, food service, banking, healthcare and education, all thriving on the strong North Central Arkansas work ethic.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

City of Tampa

306 E Jackson St, Tampa, FL, US, 33602
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

The City of Tampa is the largest city in Hillsborough County, is the county seat and is the third most populous city in Florida. It is located on the west coast of Florida, approximately 200 miles northwest of Miami, 180 southwest of Jacksonville, and 20 miles northeast of St. Petersburg. The population of the city represents approximately one-third of the total population of Hillsborough County. Tampa's economy is founded on a diverse base that includes tourism, agriculture, construction, finance, health care, government, technology, and the port of Tampa. Contributing to the success of our community is the way businesses, City government, and citizens work together to make Tampa a better place to live.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 2,078
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/harrison-regional-chamber-of-commerce.jpeg
Harrison Regional Chamber of Commerce
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cityoftampa.jpeg
City of Tampa
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Harrison Regional Chamber of Commerce
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
City of Tampa
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Harrison Regional Chamber of Commerce in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Relations Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for City of Tampa in 2025.

Incident History — Harrison Regional Chamber of Commerce (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Harrison Regional Chamber of Commerce cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — City of Tampa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

City of Tampa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/harrison-regional-chamber-of-commerce.jpeg
Harrison Regional Chamber of Commerce
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cityoftampa.jpeg
City of Tampa
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

City of Tampa company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Harrison Regional Chamber of Commerce company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, City of Tampa company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Harrison Regional Chamber of Commerce company.

In the current year, City of Tampa company and Harrison Regional Chamber of Commerce company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither City of Tampa company nor Harrison Regional Chamber of Commerce company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither City of Tampa company nor Harrison Regional Chamber of Commerce company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither City of Tampa company nor Harrison Regional Chamber of Commerce company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Harrison Regional Chamber of Commerce company nor City of Tampa company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Harrison Regional Chamber of Commerce nor City of Tampa holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Harrison Regional Chamber of Commerce company nor City of Tampa company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

City of Tampa company employs more people globally than Harrison Regional Chamber of Commerce company, reflecting its scale as a Government Relations.

Neither Harrison Regional Chamber of Commerce nor City of Tampa holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Harrison Regional Chamber of Commerce nor City of Tampa holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Harrison Regional Chamber of Commerce nor City of Tampa holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Harrison Regional Chamber of Commerce nor City of Tampa holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Harrison Regional Chamber of Commerce nor City of Tampa holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Harrison Regional Chamber of Commerce nor City of Tampa holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N