Comparison Overview

Harrison Agency

VS

C&C Studios

Harrison Agency

undefined, Brighton, undefined, undefined, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-03

Harrison Agency was formed in 2003 when Chris Harrison decided to set up his own studio after years working in some of the world’s biggest agencies, including Saatchi & Saatchi, where his career began in 1991. At heart we’re ideas people, in love with creativity in all its disciplines. Thinking, sketching, experimenting and designing – it's in our personalities, not just our job descriptions. Therefore it's no exaggeration to say we're in our element when it comes to helping clients solve their design and branding challenges. From branding for start-ups to brand consultancy for larger organisations, we work with a diverse range of clients, including orchestras, arts festivals, national charities, financial services brands, government agencies and more.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

C&C Studios

undefined, Los Angeles, California, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Within C&C Studios we focus, create, and consult primarily in three digital art mediums: photopgrahy, editing, and website development. To know us a bit, our organisation was founded in Southern California in 2018, but we are not tied to any location! We are always open to add more people into C&C Studios as long as you keep an open mind and yearn to learn more about the digital arts! All of our members are knowledgeable in at least one of the listed digital art mediums and are constantly learning more!

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/harrison-agency.jpeg
Harrison Agency
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cnc-studios.jpeg
C&C Studios
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Harrison Agency
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
C&C Studios
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Harrison Agency in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for C&C Studios in 2025.

Incident History — Harrison Agency (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Harrison Agency cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — C&C Studios (X = Date, Y = Severity)

C&C Studios cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/harrison-agency.jpeg
Harrison Agency
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cnc-studios.jpeg
C&C Studios
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

C&C Studios company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Harrison Agency company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, C&C Studios company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Harrison Agency company.

In the current year, C&C Studios company and Harrison Agency company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither C&C Studios company nor Harrison Agency company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither C&C Studios company nor Harrison Agency company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither C&C Studios company nor Harrison Agency company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Harrison Agency company nor C&C Studios company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Harrison Agency nor C&C Studios holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Harrison Agency company nor C&C Studios company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

C&C Studios company employs more people globally than Harrison Agency company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Harrison Agency nor C&C Studios holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Harrison Agency nor C&C Studios holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Harrison Agency nor C&C Studios holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Harrison Agency nor C&C Studios holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Harrison Agency nor C&C Studios holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Harrison Agency nor C&C Studios holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X