Comparison Overview

Harlowe

VS

CGF

Harlowe

Chicago, 60611, US
Last Update: 2025-12-15
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.harlowe.com/?utm_source=LinkedIn&utm_medium=accountbio&utm_campaign=profile

Illuminate a new world with Harlowe. Creation is at the heart of our existence. Our bold, powerful, and beautiful retro-chic lights give creators the freedom to express themselves anytime, anywhere. Balancing functionality and aesthetics, we provide creators with continuous lighting kits serving to elevate productivity, identity and creativity. Each Harlowe product merges innovation with durability and sustainability, championing the modern creative’s right to defy convention. We believe that your light can be bold, powerful and beautiful, and that it deserves to be seen. Our beautifully designed, vintage-lights enable creators to unlock their potential to express the art of their dreams. We believe your light can be bold, powerful and beautiful- and that it deserves to be seen. #FreedomToCreate

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

CGF

Inspektowa 11 Poznań, wielkopolskie 61-680, PL
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 700 and 749
http://obywatelgc.com

The company focuses on several kinds of photography: studio, wedding, outdoor sessions, events, corporate photos. Almost 4 years of being on a market and over 25 years of being interested in photography. Many years of experience, head full of ideas, trying to be creative as much as possible. See more at the company's website http://obywatelgc.com

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/harlowecreators.jpeg
Harlowe
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cgf.jpeg
CGF
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Harlowe
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CGF
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Harlowe in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CGF in 2025.

Incident History — Harlowe (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Harlowe cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CGF (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CGF cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/harlowecreators.jpeg
Harlowe
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cgf.jpeg
CGF
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Harlowe company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CGF company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CGF company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Harlowe company.

In the current year, CGF company and Harlowe company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CGF company nor Harlowe company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CGF company nor Harlowe company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CGF company nor Harlowe company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Harlowe company nor CGF company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Harlowe nor CGF holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Harlowe company nor CGF company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Harlowe company employs more people globally than CGF company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither Harlowe nor CGF holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Harlowe nor CGF holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Harlowe nor CGF holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Harlowe nor CGF holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Harlowe nor CGF holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Harlowe nor CGF holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References