Comparison Overview

Harbor Freight Tools

VS

Metro Inc.

Harbor Freight Tools

26677 Agoura Road, Calabasas, CA, US, 91302
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

We're a 45 year-old, $8 billion national tool retailer with the energy, enthusiasm, and growth potential of a start-up. We have over 1,600 stores in 48 states across the country and are opening several new locations every week. We offer our customers more than 7,000 tools and accessories, from hand tools and generators to air and power tools, from shop equipment to automotive tools. We provide our customers with the right tool for the right job at the right price, always delivering quality and value.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 15,614
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Metro Inc.

11011 boul. Maurice-Duplessis, Montréal, Québec, H1C 1V6, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

With annual sales of more than $21 billion, METRO Inc. is a food and pharmacy leader in Québec and Ontario, providing employment to more than 97,000 people. Its purpose is to Nourish the health and well-being of our communities. As a retailer, franchisor, distributor, manufacturer, and provider of eCommerce services, the company operates or services a network of 995 food stores under several banners including Metro, Metro Plus, Super C, Food Basics, Adonis and Première Moisson, and some 640 pharmacies primarily under the Jean Coutu, Brunet, Metro Pharmacy and Food Basics Pharmacy banners. For more details, visit corpo.metro.ca

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 19,235
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/harbor-freight-tools.jpeg
Harbor Freight Tools
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/metro-inc..jpeg
Metro Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Harbor Freight Tools
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Metro Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Harbor Freight Tools in 2025.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Metro Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — Harbor Freight Tools (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Harbor Freight Tools cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Metro Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Metro Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/harbor-freight-tools.jpeg
Harbor Freight Tools
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2013
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/metro-inc..jpeg
Metro Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Harbor Freight Tools company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Metro Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Harbor Freight Tools company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Metro Inc. company has not reported any.

In the current year, Metro Inc. company and Harbor Freight Tools company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Metro Inc. company nor Harbor Freight Tools company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Harbor Freight Tools company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Metro Inc. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Metro Inc. company nor Harbor Freight Tools company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Harbor Freight Tools company nor Metro Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Harbor Freight Tools nor Metro Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Harbor Freight Tools company nor Metro Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Metro Inc. company employs more people globally than Harbor Freight Tools company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither Harbor Freight Tools nor Metro Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Harbor Freight Tools nor Metro Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Harbor Freight Tools nor Metro Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Harbor Freight Tools nor Metro Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Harbor Freight Tools nor Metro Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Harbor Freight Tools nor Metro Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H