Comparison Overview

Happy Hollow Foundation

VS

The Ohio State Reformatory MRPS

Happy Hollow Foundation

1300 Senter Road, None, San Jose, CA, US, 95112
Last Update: 2025-12-02

Happy Hollow Foundation is a 501 (c)(3) non-profit organization established in 1958. Our vision is to foster pride and involvement so that Happy Hollow Park & Zoo remains a community asset that is highly valued and accessible to all. Our mission is to support conservation, education and play through innovative programming and strategic fundraising.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Ohio State Reformatory MRPS

100 Reformatory Rd, Mansfield, Ohio, US, 44905
Last Update: 2025-12-02

The cornerstone laid on November 4, 1886 evolved into this magnificent Chateauesque structure. Cleveland architect Levi T. Scofield designed the Ohio State Reformatory using a combination of three architectural styles; Victorian Gothic, Richardsonian Romanesque and Queen Anne. This was done to encourage inmates back to a "rebirth"​ of their spiritual lives. The architecture itself inspired them to turn away from their sinful lifestyle, and toward repentance The Reformatory doors were opened to its first 150 young offenders in September 1896. After housing over 155,000 men in its lifetime, the doors to the prison closed December 31, 1990. Today the Ohio State Reformatory Historic Site receives visitors from all over the world. Every year tourists, movie buffs, thrill seekers and paranormal investigators walk through the halls of this majestic structure.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 20
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/happyhollowfoundation.jpeg
Happy Hollow Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-ohio-state-reformatory-mrps.jpeg
The Ohio State Reformatory MRPS
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Happy Hollow Foundation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Ohio State Reformatory MRPS
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Happy Hollow Foundation in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Ohio State Reformatory MRPS in 2025.

Incident History — Happy Hollow Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Happy Hollow Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Ohio State Reformatory MRPS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Ohio State Reformatory MRPS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/happyhollowfoundation.jpeg
Happy Hollow Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-ohio-state-reformatory-mrps.jpeg
The Ohio State Reformatory MRPS
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Ohio State Reformatory MRPS company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Happy Hollow Foundation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Ohio State Reformatory MRPS company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Happy Hollow Foundation company.

In the current year, The Ohio State Reformatory MRPS company and Happy Hollow Foundation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Ohio State Reformatory MRPS company nor Happy Hollow Foundation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Ohio State Reformatory MRPS company nor Happy Hollow Foundation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Ohio State Reformatory MRPS company nor Happy Hollow Foundation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Happy Hollow Foundation company nor The Ohio State Reformatory MRPS company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Happy Hollow Foundation nor The Ohio State Reformatory MRPS holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Happy Hollow Foundation company nor The Ohio State Reformatory MRPS company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Ohio State Reformatory MRPS company employs more people globally than Happy Hollow Foundation company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Happy Hollow Foundation nor The Ohio State Reformatory MRPS holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Happy Hollow Foundation nor The Ohio State Reformatory MRPS holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Happy Hollow Foundation nor The Ohio State Reformatory MRPS holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Happy Hollow Foundation nor The Ohio State Reformatory MRPS holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Happy Hollow Foundation nor The Ohio State Reformatory MRPS holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Happy Hollow Foundation nor The Ohio State Reformatory MRPS holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X