Comparison Overview

Hanshaw Kennedy Hafen, LLP

VS

Bishop & McKenzie LLP

Hanshaw Kennedy Hafen, LLP

1415 Legacy Dr # 350, Frisco, Texas, 75034-1848, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Hanshaw Kennedy Hafen, LLP is a multi-practice law firm based in Frisco, Texas. Our attorneys handle a broad range of practice areas including commercial litigation, business law, healthcare law, estate planning, catastrophic injury, divorce and family law. We represent a diverse client base that consists of individuals and businesses ranging from sole proprietorships, family offices, newly formed startups to large corporations in a wide range of industries. Our breadth of experience includes handling matters across the United States and matters reaching as far as Latin America, Europe and Asia. We take pride in the relationships we develop with our clients. We view our clients as partners and strive to develop relationships that last beyond the resolution of the initial legal need. Call us today and let us become a partner you can trust.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bishop & McKenzie LLP

2300, 10180 - 101 Street NW, Edmonton, Alberta, T5J 3S4, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Bishop & McKenzie is a mid-size law firm for those who want the breadth of services available at a national firm, with the personalized attention you deserve. We work harder to get to know you, your business and your situation. You can count on clear advice in plain language. With knowledgeable legal guidance that opens the door to new opportunities.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 78
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hanshaw-kennedy-llp.jpeg
Hanshaw Kennedy Hafen, LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bishop-mckenzie-llp.jpeg
Bishop & McKenzie LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hanshaw Kennedy Hafen, LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bishop & McKenzie LLP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hanshaw Kennedy Hafen, LLP in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bishop & McKenzie LLP in 2025.

Incident History — Hanshaw Kennedy Hafen, LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hanshaw Kennedy Hafen, LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bishop & McKenzie LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bishop & McKenzie LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hanshaw-kennedy-llp.jpeg
Hanshaw Kennedy Hafen, LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bishop-mckenzie-llp.jpeg
Bishop & McKenzie LLP
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Hanshaw Kennedy Hafen, LLP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bishop & McKenzie LLP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Bishop & McKenzie LLP company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hanshaw Kennedy Hafen, LLP company.

In the current year, Bishop & McKenzie LLP company and Hanshaw Kennedy Hafen, LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bishop & McKenzie LLP company nor Hanshaw Kennedy Hafen, LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bishop & McKenzie LLP company nor Hanshaw Kennedy Hafen, LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bishop & McKenzie LLP company nor Hanshaw Kennedy Hafen, LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hanshaw Kennedy Hafen, LLP company nor Bishop & McKenzie LLP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hanshaw Kennedy Hafen, LLP nor Bishop & McKenzie LLP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Hanshaw Kennedy Hafen, LLP company nor Bishop & McKenzie LLP company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Bishop & McKenzie LLP company employs more people globally than Hanshaw Kennedy Hafen, LLP company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Hanshaw Kennedy Hafen, LLP nor Bishop & McKenzie LLP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hanshaw Kennedy Hafen, LLP nor Bishop & McKenzie LLP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hanshaw Kennedy Hafen, LLP nor Bishop & McKenzie LLP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hanshaw Kennedy Hafen, LLP nor Bishop & McKenzie LLP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hanshaw Kennedy Hafen, LLP nor Bishop & McKenzie LLP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hanshaw Kennedy Hafen, LLP nor Bishop & McKenzie LLP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X