Comparison Overview

Hansen Networks

VS

Verizon

Hansen Networks

4255 Dean Martin Drive, Ste C, Las Vegas, NV, 89103, US
Last Update: 2025-03-07 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Hansen Networks is a premier information technology company providing managed services and project based solutions. We primarily focus on small and midsize companies that benefit from our resources and expertise for their technology demands, essentially creating a virtual IT department. Our modern proactive approach enables our clients to keep their work force productive and limit costly downtime. Believing that technology is an investment and vital asset to any business, Hansen Networks is committed to the future of business computing and is at the forefront of the industry.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Verizon

Last Update: 2024-08-13 (UTC)

You want more out of a career. A place to share your ideas freely โ€” even if theyโ€™re daring or different. Where the true you can thrive, at work and in life. A space to connect with people who care and are united by purpose. Our culture is shaped by people like you from across the globe. We anticipate, lead, and believe that listening is where learning begins. In crisis and in celebration, we come together as the V Team โ€” lifting up our communities and building trust in how we show up โ€ฆ everywhere and always. Here, we power and empower how people live, work and play by connecting them to what matters most. If doing meaningful and exciting work gets you energized, start the next chapter of your career with us.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 94,094
Subsidiaries: 18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
9
Attack type number
4

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hansen-networks.jpeg
Hansen Networks
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/Verizon.jpeg
Verizon
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Hansen Networks
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Verizon
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hansen Networks in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Verizon in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Hansen Networks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hansen Networks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” Verizon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Verizon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hansen-networks.jpeg
Hansen Networks
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/Verizon.jpeg
Verizon
Incidents

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Unsecured API
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: Influence Operations, Espionage
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Network Penetration
Motivation: Espionage, Influence Operations
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Hansen Networks company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to Verizon company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

Verizon company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Hansen Networks company has not reported any.

In the current year, Verizon company has reported more cyber incidents than Hansen Networks company.

Neither Verizon company nor Hansen Networks company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Verizon company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Hansen Networks company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Verizon company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Hansen Networks company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Verizon company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Hansen Networks company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Verizon company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Hansen Networks company.

Verizon company employs more people globally than Hansen Networks company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

TS3 Manager is modern web interface for maintaining Teamspeak3 servers. A reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability has been identified in versions 2.2.1 and earlier. The vulnerability exists in the error handling mechanism of the login page, where malicious scripts embedded in server hostnames are executed in the victim's browser context without proper sanitization. This issue is fixed in version 2.2.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

TS3 Manager is modern web interface for maintaining Teamspeak3 servers. A Denial of Dervice vulnerability has been identified in versions 2.2.1 and earlier. The vulnerability permits an unauthenticated actor to crash the application through the submission of specially crafted Unicode input, requiring no prior authentication or privileges. The flaw manifests when Unicode tag characters are submitted to the Server field on the login page. The application fails to properly handle these characters during the ASCII conversion process, resulting in an unhandled exception that terminates the application within four to five seconds of submission. This issue is fixed in version 2.2.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Weblate is a web based localization tool. An open redirect exists in versions 5.13.2 and below via the redir parameter on .within.website when Weblate is configured with Anubis and REDIRECT_DOMAINS is not set. An attacker can craft a URL on the legitimate domain that redirects a victim to an attacker-controlled site. The redirect can also be used to initiate drive-by downloads (redirecting to a URL that serves a malicious file), increasing the risk to end users. This issue is fixed in version 5.13.3.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Termix is a web-based server management platform with SSH terminal, tunneling, and file editing capabilities. The official Docker image for Termix versions 1.5.0 and below, due to being configured with an Nginx reverse proxy, causes the backend to retrieve the proxy's IP instead of the client's IP when using the req.ip method. This results in isLocalhost always returning True. Consequently, the /ssh/db/host/internal endpoint can be accessed directly without login or authentication. This endpoint records the system's stored SSH host information, including addresses, usernames, and passwords, posing an extremely high security risk. Users who use the official Termix docker image, build their own image using the official dockerfile, or utilize reverse proxy functionality will be affected by this vulnerability. This issue is fixed in version 1.6.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OpenPLC_V3 has a vulnerability in the enipThread function that occurs due to the lack of a return value. This leads to a crash when the server loop ends and execution hits an illegal ud2 instruction. This issue can be triggered remotely without authentication by starting the same server multiple times or if the server exits unexpectedly. The vulnerability allows an attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) against the PLC runtime, stopping any PC started remotely without authentication. This results in the PLC process crashing and halting all automation or control logic managed by OpenPLC.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X