Comparison Overview

Handle Branding

VS

Swinton Studio

Handle Branding

5 Fleet Street, North Parramatta 2151, North Parramatta, New South Wales, 2151, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-03

Handle is a branding and creative design agency dedicated to helping brands drive open honest relationships with their audience. We open the hearts and minds of the people through creative outcomes and experiences. By breaking down the barriers often found in communication we seek new opportunities, boundaries, and conversations. With an award-winning portfolio of projects, our work drives our ongoing clear thinking, straightforward communication, and considered execution in every challenge. Thought branding and design consultancy Handle are able to produce a diverse range of work spanning across identity, art direction, strategy branding, place making, spatial, web design and animation. We help our clients communicate their message clearly and intelligently, delivering design solutions and advice to a wide range of clients—from private corporate clients and Government organisations. Through engaging our clients as creative partners we are able to involve them in the conversation resulting in relevant and compelling solutions.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Swinton Studio

undefined, undefined, undefined, 07882, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Established in 1987, Swinton Studio has built a reputation for excellence while becoming one of the areas premier design firms. Our full-service studio provides a complete arsenal of professional services, delivering the very best in design, marketing and interactive services. Our clients range from Fortune 500 companies to upstart entrepreneurs. We provide total project management resulting in a level of excellence which has become synonymous with Swinton Studio.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/handle-branding.jpeg
Handle Branding
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/swinton-studio.jpeg
Swinton Studio
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Handle Branding
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Swinton Studio
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Handle Branding in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Swinton Studio in 2025.

Incident History — Handle Branding (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Handle Branding cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Swinton Studio (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Swinton Studio cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/handle-branding.jpeg
Handle Branding
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/swinton-studio.jpeg
Swinton Studio
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Swinton Studio company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Handle Branding company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Swinton Studio company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Handle Branding company.

In the current year, Swinton Studio company and Handle Branding company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Swinton Studio company nor Handle Branding company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Swinton Studio company nor Handle Branding company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Swinton Studio company nor Handle Branding company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Handle Branding company nor Swinton Studio company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Handle Branding nor Swinton Studio holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Handle Branding company nor Swinton Studio company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Handle Branding company employs more people globally than Swinton Studio company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Handle Branding nor Swinton Studio holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Handle Branding nor Swinton Studio holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Handle Branding nor Swinton Studio holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Handle Branding nor Swinton Studio holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Handle Branding nor Swinton Studio holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Handle Branding nor Swinton Studio holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X