Comparison Overview

Hancock Shaker Village

VS

Foundation for the WA Museum

Hancock Shaker Village

None, None, None, None, US, 01202
Last Update: 2026-01-23

Hancock Shaker Village brings the Shaker story to life and preserves it for future generations. This is a place not only to preserve the Shakers’ story, but to find meaning in the Shakers’ beliefs and culture for our time. Hancock Shaker Village is a center for reflection on living a principled life in the 21st century. The Shakers, at their essence, are ordinary people who made an extraordinary choice to gather together in community in order to live a principled life. The values that the Shakers embraced—equality, nonviolence, community, sustainability, responsible land stewardship, innovation, simplicity, embodiment of a spiritual ideal, and quality in work - resonate for us today. We strive, in our programs and in our business practices to reflect these values. We utilize our site and our collections to help the public engage with contemporary thinking on these principles while learning about historical Shaker expression of these principles in their work, worship and community. The Village today consists of 20 historic buildings set amongst farm, field, meadow and woodland, and a collection of 22,200 objects. Each year visitors from around the world come to the Village to experience the City of Peace, participate in programs, view the Village's premier collection, and learn about Shaker life. The high quality of museum standards maintained by the Village is evidenced through its accreditation by the American Association of Museums. The Village is rated three stars by the Michelin Guide, a consistent Editor's Pick by Yankee Magazine's Travel Guide to New England, an AAA Gem, and has been selected as "Best of the Road" by Rand McNally. Hancock Shaker Village was designated a National Historic Landmark in 1968.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 42
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Foundation for the WA Museum

140 William St, Perth, Western Australia, 6000, AU
Last Update: 2026-01-16
Between 750 and 799

The best structures are built on strong foundations. The Foundation for the WA Museum believes that museums should spark a love of learning in the next generation. They should nurture a fascination with the past, an understanding of the present, and a passion for the future – and inspire us all in unexpected ways. Importantly, they should influence and motivate young people to investigate the areas of science, technology, the arts and mathematics in the world around them. The Foundation for the WA Museum is an independent organisation that has been committed to securing the future of our state heritage since 1995.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hancock-shaker-village.jpeg
Hancock Shaker Village
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hancock Shaker Village
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Foundation for the WA Museum
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hancock Shaker Village in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Foundation for the WA Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Hancock Shaker Village (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hancock Shaker Village cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Foundation for the WA Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Foundation for the WA Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hancock-shaker-village.jpeg
Hancock Shaker Village
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foundation-for-the-wa-museum.jpeg
Foundation for the WA Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Hancock Shaker Village company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Foundation for the WA Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Foundation for the WA Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hancock Shaker Village company.

In the current year, Foundation for the WA Museum company and Hancock Shaker Village company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Foundation for the WA Museum company nor Hancock Shaker Village company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Foundation for the WA Museum company nor Hancock Shaker Village company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Foundation for the WA Museum company nor Hancock Shaker Village company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hancock Shaker Village company nor Foundation for the WA Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hancock Shaker Village nor Foundation for the WA Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Hancock Shaker Village company nor Foundation for the WA Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Hancock Shaker Village company employs more people globally than Foundation for the WA Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Hancock Shaker Village nor Foundation for the WA Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hancock Shaker Village nor Foundation for the WA Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hancock Shaker Village nor Foundation for the WA Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hancock Shaker Village nor Foundation for the WA Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hancock Shaker Village nor Foundation for the WA Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hancock Shaker Village nor Foundation for the WA Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H