Comparison Overview

Hana Nails

VS

Studio CA

Studio CA

Kammakargatan 29 Stockholm, SE
Last Update: 2025-03-16 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

Studio CA är en reklamfotostudio belägen mitt i hjärtat av Stockholm. Fotografi – Produkter, stilleben, kläder, mat, människor – i studio eller på location. Våra uppdrag varierar enormt och så vill vi gärna ha det. I grund och botten är alla fotograferingar reklamuppdrag. Retusch – Det finns många fördelar att ha egna retuschörer i huset. Arbetet blir oerhört mycket effektivare och erfarenheten visar att kvaliteten ökar. Vi retuscherar inte bara våra egna bilder utan även andras också, det är inget krav att fotografera hos oss bara för att få använda våra duktiga retuschörer. 3D/CGI – En produkt som inte finns ännu måste fotograferas eller människor som skall fotograferas i en miljö som inte finns? Knepigt? I såna här fall tar vi till våra duktiga 3D-artister som kan skapa det mesta som inte finns.

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 2-10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hana-nails.jpeg
Hana Nails
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Studio CA
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Hana Nails
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Studio CA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hana Nails in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Studio CA in 2025.

Incident History — Hana Nails (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hana Nails cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Studio CA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Studio CA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hana-nails.jpeg
Hana Nails
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Studio CA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Hana Nails company and Studio CA company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Studio CA company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hana Nails company.

In the current year, Studio CA company and Hana Nails company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Studio CA company nor Hana Nails company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Studio CA company nor Hana Nails company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Studio CA company nor Hana Nails company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hana Nails company nor Studio CA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hana Nails company nor Studio CA company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Hana Nails company employs more people globally than Studio CA company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Formbricks is an open source qualtrics alternative. Prior to version 4.0.1, Formbricks is missing JWT signature verification. This vulnerability stems from a token validation routine that only decodes JWTs (jwt.decode) without verifying their signatures. Both the email verification token login path and the password reset server action use the same validator, which does not check the token’s signature, expiration, issuer, or audience. If an attacker learns the victim’s actual user.id, they can craft an arbitrary JWT with an alg: "none" header and use it to authenticate and reset the victim’s password. This issue has been patched in version 4.0.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

Apollo Studio Embeddable Explorer & Embeddable Sandbox are website embeddable software solutions from Apollo GraphQL. Prior to Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3, a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified. The vulnerability arises from missing origin validation in the client-side code that handles window.postMessage events. A malicious website can send forged messages to the embedding page, causing the victim’s browser to execute arbitrary GraphQL queries or mutations against their GraphQL server while authenticated with the victim’s cookies. This issue has been patched in Apollo Sandbox version 2.7.2 and Apollo Explorer version 3.7.3.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N
Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /consulta-dispensas. Such manipulation leads to improper authorization. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A weakness has been identified in Portabilis i-Educar up to 2.10. Affected is an unknown function of the file /module/Api/aluno. This manipulation of the argument aluno_id causes improper authorization. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Tencent WeKnora 0.1.0. This impacts the function testEmbeddingModel of the file /api/v1/initialization/embedding/test. The manipulation of the argument baseUrl results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component. The vendor responds: "We have confirmed that the issue mentioned in the report does not exist in the latest releases".

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X