Comparison Overview

Hammerton

VS

MityLite

Hammerton

217 Wright Brothers Drive, Suite A, Salt Lake City, UT, 84116, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

The largest U.S. custom decorative lighting manufacturer, Hammerton, is renowned for its innovative work in artisan glass and metalwork. Founded in 1995, the company employs over 150 in its Salt Lake City headquarters, where metal artisans and glass blowers work alongside industrial designers, engineers, machinists, paint technicians and assembly teams. Hammerton sells a wide selection of made-to-order lighting under its Hammerton Studio, Hammerton Signature, and Hammerton Heritage brands.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 134
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

MityLite

1301 W 400 N, Orem, 84057, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

MityLite is a global manufacturer of professionally designed, highly durable furniture products. An award-winning manufacturer of meeting, event, and banquet furniture for 30 years, MityLite furniture products are trusted worldwide. We have the most elite, creative, and passionate team of employees in the industry! They are committed to serving our business partners. Interested in joining our team or doing business with MityLite? Email [email protected] or call 800-909-8034.

NAICS: 337
NAICS Definition: Furniture and Related Product Manufacturing
Employees: 158
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hammerton.jpeg
Hammerton
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mitylite.jpeg
MityLite
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hammerton
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MityLite
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hammerton in 2025.

Incidents vs Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MityLite in 2025.

Incident History — Hammerton (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hammerton cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MityLite (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MityLite cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hammerton.jpeg
Hammerton
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mitylite.jpeg
MityLite
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Hammerton company and MityLite company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, MityLite company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hammerton company.

In the current year, MityLite company and Hammerton company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither MityLite company nor Hammerton company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither MityLite company nor Hammerton company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither MityLite company nor Hammerton company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hammerton company nor MityLite company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hammerton nor MityLite holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Hammerton company nor MityLite company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

MityLite company employs more people globally than Hammerton company, reflecting its scale as a Furniture and Home Furnishings Manufacturing.

Neither Hammerton nor MityLite holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hammerton nor MityLite holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hammerton nor MityLite holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hammerton nor MityLite holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hammerton nor MityLite holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hammerton nor MityLite holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.