Comparison Overview

Hamilton Community Legal Clinic

VS

Francis Burt Chambers

Hamilton Community Legal Clinic

100 MAIN STREET EAST SUITE 203, Hamilton, Ontario L9N 3W4, ca
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

We're a non-profit community legal clinic serving low income residents of Hamilton. In addition, to providing ‘traditional” poverty law services including legal advice & referrals and legal representation, the Clinic is involved in public legal education, community development and law reform. Hamilton Community Legal Clinic is a community based not for profit agency whose diverse team of caring professionals and volunteers provides legal services to low income individuals and communities to promote access to justice and to improve quality of life. We do this through: summary advice and referral, representation, community development, law reform and public legal education Our Vision Hamilton Community Legal Clinic will be recognized and valued as an important provider of poverty law services and advocate for social change.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Francis Burt Chambers

77 St Georges Terrace, Perth, Western Australia, 6000, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Established in 1962, Francis Burt Chambers and its members have been proudly serving the legal profession and wider community for 60 years. As the largest and oldest Chambers in Western Australia, we are renowned for the wide range of specialities and unparalleled depth of experience of our members. Our independent barristers share the common goal of providing ethical, accessible, and independent advice; and are sought after by solicitors and members of the legal profession for diverse briefs. Francis Burt Chambers also fosters and develops the practice of our barristers at all stages of their careers.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 144
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/francis-burt-chambers.jpeg
Francis Burt Chambers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hamilton Community Legal Clinic
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Francis Burt Chambers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hamilton Community Legal Clinic in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Francis Burt Chambers in 2025.

Incident History — Hamilton Community Legal Clinic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hamilton Community Legal Clinic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Francis Burt Chambers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Francis Burt Chambers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hamilton-community-legal-clinic.jpeg
Hamilton Community Legal Clinic
Incidents
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/francis-burt-chambers.jpeg
Francis Burt Chambers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Hamilton Community Legal Clinic company and Francis Burt Chambers company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Francis Burt Chambers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hamilton Community Legal Clinic company.

In the current year, Francis Burt Chambers company and Hamilton Community Legal Clinic company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Francis Burt Chambers company nor Hamilton Community Legal Clinic company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Francis Burt Chambers company nor Hamilton Community Legal Clinic company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Francis Burt Chambers company nor Hamilton Community Legal Clinic company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hamilton Community Legal Clinic company nor Francis Burt Chambers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hamilton Community Legal Clinic nor Francis Burt Chambers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Hamilton Community Legal Clinic company nor Francis Burt Chambers company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Francis Burt Chambers company employs more people globally than Hamilton Community Legal Clinic company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Hamilton Community Legal Clinic nor Francis Burt Chambers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hamilton Community Legal Clinic nor Francis Burt Chambers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hamilton Community Legal Clinic nor Francis Burt Chambers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hamilton Community Legal Clinic nor Francis Burt Chambers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hamilton Community Legal Clinic nor Francis Burt Chambers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hamilton Community Legal Clinic nor Francis Burt Chambers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X