Comparison Overview

O&M Halyard

VS

The University of Texas Medical Branch

O&M Halyard

1220 Old Alpharetta Road, Suite 320, Alpharetta, Georgia, 30005, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.halyardhealth.com

HALYARD*, part of the Owens & Minor family, is focused on moving care forward. Our portfolio of market-leading brands includes HALYARD*, MediChoice®, and Medical Action® which are sold in more than 90 countries. The broad HALYARD* portfolio offers the right product for each need, backed by best-in-class clinical expertise and more support at points of care. Our product standardization opportunities combined with supply chain expertise help drive efficiencies and protect healthcare providers from risks and disruptions in care. HALYARD* sells its recognized sterilization wrap, facial protection, gloves, protective apparel, surgical drapes and gowns in more than 100 countries, and holds leading market positions across the portfolio. For more information, visit www.halyardhealth.com.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 744
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

The University of Texas Medical Branch

301 University Blvd, Galveston, Texas, US, 77550
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799
http://utmb.jobs

ABOUT THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH: Texas' first academic health center opened its doors in 1891 and today has four campuses, five health sciences schools, six institutes for advanced study, a research enterprise that includes one of only two national laboratories dedicated to the safe study of infectious threats to human health, a Level 1 Trauma Center and a health system offering a full range of primary and specialized medical services throughout the Texas Gulf Coast region. UTMB is an institution in the University of Texas System and a member of the Texas Medical Center.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 11,665
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/halyard-health.jpeg
O&M Halyard
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/utmb.jpeg
The University of Texas Medical Branch
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
O&M Halyard
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The University of Texas Medical Branch
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for O&M Halyard in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The University of Texas Medical Branch in 2025.

Incident History — O&M Halyard (X = Date, Y = Severity)

O&M Halyard cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The University of Texas Medical Branch (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The University of Texas Medical Branch cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/halyard-health.jpeg
O&M Halyard
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2024
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/utmb.jpeg
The University of Texas Medical Branch
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The University of Texas Medical Branch company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to O&M Halyard company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

O&M Halyard company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas The University of Texas Medical Branch company has not reported any.

In the current year, The University of Texas Medical Branch company and O&M Halyard company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The University of Texas Medical Branch company nor O&M Halyard company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

O&M Halyard company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other The University of Texas Medical Branch company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither The University of Texas Medical Branch company nor O&M Halyard company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither O&M Halyard company nor The University of Texas Medical Branch company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither O&M Halyard nor The University of Texas Medical Branch holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

O&M Halyard company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to The University of Texas Medical Branch company.

The University of Texas Medical Branch company employs more people globally than O&M Halyard company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither O&M Halyard nor The University of Texas Medical Branch holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither O&M Halyard nor The University of Texas Medical Branch holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither O&M Halyard nor The University of Texas Medical Branch holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither O&M Halyard nor The University of Texas Medical Branch holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither O&M Halyard nor The University of Texas Medical Branch holds HIPAA certification.

Neither O&M Halyard nor The University of Texas Medical Branch holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability has been found in SeaCMS up to 13.3. The affected element is an unknown function of the file js/player/dmplayer/dmku/class/mysqli.class.php. Such manipulation of the argument page/limit leads to sql injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Published
Date
2025-12-21
Updated
Date
2025-12-21
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in HappyDevs TempTool allows Stored XSS.This issue affects TempTool: from n/a through 1.3.1.

Published
Date
2025-12-21
Updated
Date
2025-12-21
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Tormorten WP Microdata allows Stored XSS.This issue affects WP Microdata: from n/a through 1.0.

Published
Date
2025-12-21
Updated
Date
2025-12-21
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

Exposure of Sensitive System Information to an Unauthorized Control Sphere vulnerability in HappyDevs TempTool allows Retrieve Embedded Sensitive Data.This issue affects TempTool: from n/a through 1.3.1.

Published
Date
2025-12-21
Updated
Date
2025-12-21
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

A vulnerability has been found in Tenda FH1201 1.2.0.14(408). Affected is the function sprintf of the file /goform/SetIpBind. Such manipulation of the argument page leads to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Published
Date
2025-12-21
Updated
Date
2025-12-21
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 9.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References