Comparison Overview

Hallam Law Group

VS

Complete Legal

Hallam Law Group

5343 North 16th Street, Phoenix, AZ, 85016, US
Last Update: 2026-04-04

Hallam Law Group is an experienced felony trial law firm with an outstanding history of working in criminal courtrooms throughout Arizona. Our law firm offers quality legal counsel in various areas of law including: assault, felony DUI, robbery, domestic violence, sexual abuse, felony shoplifting and many more. Hallam has steered through over a thousand criminal cases and some high-level felonies such as sex crimes, and homicides. Contact our skilled attorneys for a free consultation.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Complete Legal

5909 Martway St, Mission, Kansas, 66202, US
Last Update: 2026-04-03
Between 750 and 799

Complete Legal is a full-service litigation support and electronic discovery firm headquartered in Kansas City with full-service hubs in Chicago, New York City, and St. Louis, and an office in Boston. Employee-owned and operated, Complete Legal is focused on delivering customer value above all else and streamlines the legal industry’s approach to eDiscovery, information governance and data management.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 52
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hallam-law-group.jpeg
Hallam Law Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hallam Law Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Complete Legal
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hallam Law Group in 2026.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Complete Legal in 2026.

Incident History — Hallam Law Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hallam Law Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Complete Legal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Complete Legal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hallam-law-group.jpeg
Hallam Law Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/complete-legal-services-llc.jpeg
Complete Legal
Incidents

FAQ

Hallam Law Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Complete Legal company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Complete Legal company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hallam Law Group company.

In the current year, Complete Legal company and Hallam Law Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Complete Legal company nor Hallam Law Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Complete Legal company nor Hallam Law Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Complete Legal company nor Hallam Law Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hallam Law Group company nor Complete Legal company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hallam Law Group nor Complete Legal holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Hallam Law Group company nor Complete Legal company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Complete Legal company employs more people globally than Hallam Law Group company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Hallam Law Group nor Complete Legal holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hallam Law Group nor Complete Legal holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hallam Law Group nor Complete Legal holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hallam Law Group nor Complete Legal holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hallam Law Group nor Complete Legal holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hallam Law Group nor Complete Legal holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H