Comparison Overview

Half Moon Bay Review

VS

IngramSpark

Half Moon Bay Review

None
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 800 and 849

The Half Moon Bay Review is an award-winning community newspaper serving the San Mateo County Coastside since 1898. The Review is proud to employ a staff of trained journalists who cover local politics, local sports, local environmental issues and local features for both the newspaper and website. The news, columns and opinions on every page, cover-to-cover, focus solely on the Coastside — from Devil’s Slide to the San Mateo County line. A paid subscription newspaper, the Review publishes every Wednesday morning and is circulated by mail, counter and rack sales. The Review also publishes a variety of specialty publications including Half Moon Bay Magazine which is distributed to subscribers and racks on the Coastside and dozens of communities across the mid-peninsula. The Coastside: The Coastside includes the city of Half Moon Bay along with towns to the north: El Granada, Moss Beach and Montara — and those to the south: San Gregorio, La Honda and Pescadero. The Coastside is just over the hill from the city of San Mateo, and about 28 miles south of San Francisco along the San Mateo County coastline. The leading industry on the Coastside is floriculture, and the area is also home to Pillar Point Harbor, the only working harbor between San Francisco and Santa Cruz. In the center of it all is Half Moon Bay. The city is home to a diverse population that includes Silicon Valley engineers, longtime farming families and recent immigrants. Its restaurants and shops are among the most celebrated in the county. And nearby beaches add serenity and unparalleled beauty to the landscape. There are miles of open-space trails curving through the city — all of them providing a unique perspective on the California coast. There are a number of signature events on the coast. The granddaddy of them all is October’s Half Moon Bay Art and Pumpkin Festival, which annually draws hundreds of thousands of visitors to the city’s Main Street.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

IngramSpark

14 Ingram Blvd, La Vergne, Tennessee, 37086, US
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 750 and 799

IngramSpark is the only publishing platform that delivers fully integrated print, digital, wholesale, and distribution services to the book industry through a single source. What does that mean? Once you finish and format your book we make it possible to share it with the world. A relationship with IngramSpark allows you to focus on your specialty—creating innovative content while we manage the dull stuff: printing, shipping and distribution.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 94
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/half-moon-bay-review.jpeg
Half Moon Bay Review
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ingramspark.jpeg
IngramSpark
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Half Moon Bay Review
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
IngramSpark
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Half Moon Bay Review in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IngramSpark in 2025.

Incident History — Half Moon Bay Review (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Half Moon Bay Review cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — IngramSpark (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IngramSpark cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/half-moon-bay-review.jpeg
Half Moon Bay Review
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ingramspark.jpeg
IngramSpark
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Half Moon Bay Review company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to IngramSpark company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, IngramSpark company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Half Moon Bay Review company.

In the current year, IngramSpark company and Half Moon Bay Review company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither IngramSpark company nor Half Moon Bay Review company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither IngramSpark company nor Half Moon Bay Review company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither IngramSpark company nor Half Moon Bay Review company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Half Moon Bay Review company nor IngramSpark company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Half Moon Bay Review nor IngramSpark holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Half Moon Bay Review company nor IngramSpark company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

IngramSpark company employs more people globally than Half Moon Bay Review company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Half Moon Bay Review nor IngramSpark holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Half Moon Bay Review nor IngramSpark holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Half Moon Bay Review nor IngramSpark holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Half Moon Bay Review nor IngramSpark holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Half Moon Bay Review nor IngramSpark holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Half Moon Bay Review nor IngramSpark holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.