Comparison Overview

Haidilao

VS

Outback Steakhouse

Haidilao

None
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Official LinkedIn page for Haidilao

NAICS: 7225
NAICS Definition: Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Outback Steakhouse

2202 N. West Shore Blvd, Suite 500, Tampa, FL, US, 33607
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Made with an Australian flair, born under the Tampa sun. Outback Steakhouse is an Australian-inspired restaurant providing high quality delicious food with Aussie hospitality since 1988. Our success is based on our belief that if we take care of Our People, the institution of Outback will take care of itself. We believe people want to be part of something they can be proud of, is fun, and values them. Our goal for you as an Outbacker, is to provide a genuine environment that allows your BOLD personality to shine, creates a great place to work, and promotes inclusivity and diversity that encourages growth. By providing this for our People we set the stage for the creation of an incomparable experience for our guests through serious food, spirited drinks, and concentrated service. Outback Steakhouse is always looking for dedicated, fun-loving people to help make our restaurants a success. To get taste of what it’s like at the Outback, make sure to follow us on Instagram and Facebook at @Outbackcareers. Bloomin’ Brands, Inc. is a company of restaurants, not a restaurant company. Our family of founder-inspired brands include Outback Steakhouse, Carrabba's Italian Grill, Bonefish Grill, and Fleming's Prime Steakhouse & Wine Bar. Our People are what set us apart and they are at the center of everything we do!

NAICS: 7225
NAICS Definition: Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees: 23,325
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/haidilao-official.jpeg
Haidilao
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/outback-steakhouse.jpeg
Outback Steakhouse
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Haidilao
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Outback Steakhouse
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Haidilao in 2025.

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Outback Steakhouse in 2025.

Incident History — Haidilao (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Haidilao cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Outback Steakhouse (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Outback Steakhouse cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/haidilao-official.jpeg
Haidilao
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/outback-steakhouse.jpeg
Outback Steakhouse
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2015
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Point-of-Sale Terminal
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Haidilao company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Outback Steakhouse company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Outback Steakhouse company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Haidilao company has not reported any.

In the current year, Outback Steakhouse company and Haidilao company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Outback Steakhouse company nor Haidilao company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Outback Steakhouse company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Haidilao company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Outback Steakhouse company nor Haidilao company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Haidilao company nor Outback Steakhouse company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Haidilao nor Outback Steakhouse holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Outback Steakhouse company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Haidilao company.

Outback Steakhouse company employs more people globally than Haidilao company, reflecting its scale as a Restaurants.

Neither Haidilao nor Outback Steakhouse holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Haidilao nor Outback Steakhouse holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Haidilao nor Outback Steakhouse holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Haidilao nor Outback Steakhouse holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Haidilao nor Outback Steakhouse holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Haidilao nor Outback Steakhouse holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H