Comparison Overview

Hagley Museum and Library

VS

Bayside Historical Society

Hagley Museum and Library

200 Hagley Creek Road, None, Wilmington, DE, US, 19807
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Hagley Museum is the former industrial site of the original black powder works of the DuPont Company, founded in Delaware in 1802 and powered by the natural resources that surrounded it. Today it is 235 acres of wooded rolling hills along the rushing Brandywine River dotted with hundreds of stone ruins of the black powder industry, dozens of restored buildings associated with the business, and the original ancestral home and gardens of the du Pont family in America. Here, for more than two hundred years, the DuPont Company and family experimented, innovated, and pursued the American dream. Visitors to Hagley can see exhibitions on the du Pont story, the Industrial Revolution, water power, and simple machines. A stroll through the powder yards will reveal historic mill buildings, operating machinery, black powder demonstrations, water power in action, and the most beautiful mile of the Brandywine. Climbing Workers’ Hill will bring to light the life of DuPont workers though their homes, school, and gardens. And a ride through the ruins of the original black powder mills will lead to a guided tour of the original du Pont family home. We are the only Smithsonian Affiliate museum in Delaware and have been accredited by the American Alliance of Museums since 1972. The site is a National Historic Landmark, a National Recreation Trail, and a Historic Mechanical Engineering Landmark. Hagley is also a Let’s Move! museum. The Hagley Library is the world’s premier research library for the history of American enterprise and is a member of the Independent Research Libraries Association. In addition to holding the du Pont family and DuPont Company papers, it also holds the archives of more than 1,000 businesses. At Hagley, we invite people of all ages to investigate and experience the unfolding history of American business, technology, and innovation, and their impact on the world, from our home at the historic DuPont powder yards on the banks of the Brandywine.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 123
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Bayside Historical Society

208 Totten Avenue, Bayside, NY, 11359, US
Last Update: 2026-01-04

Bayside Historical Society was founded in 1964 to collect, preserve, and disseminate information concerning the history of Bayside and its adjacent communities; advocate for the preservation and protection of its most historic structures and distinctive neighborhoods through the landmarking process; and strive to develop a broad constituency of like-minded preservation and educational organizations to protect the historic integrity of our communities and collections.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hagley-museum-and-library.jpeg
Hagley Museum and Library
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bayside-historical-society.jpeg
Bayside Historical Society
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hagley Museum and Library
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Bayside Historical Society
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hagley Museum and Library in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bayside Historical Society in 2026.

Incident History — Hagley Museum and Library (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hagley Museum and Library cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Bayside Historical Society (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bayside Historical Society cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hagley-museum-and-library.jpeg
Hagley Museum and Library
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bayside-historical-society.jpeg
Bayside Historical Society
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Hagley Museum and Library company and Bayside Historical Society company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Bayside Historical Society company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hagley Museum and Library company.

In the current year, Bayside Historical Society company and Hagley Museum and Library company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Bayside Historical Society company nor Hagley Museum and Library company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Bayside Historical Society company nor Hagley Museum and Library company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Bayside Historical Society company nor Hagley Museum and Library company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hagley Museum and Library company nor Bayside Historical Society company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hagley Museum and Library nor Bayside Historical Society holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Hagley Museum and Library company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Bayside Historical Society company.

Hagley Museum and Library company employs more people globally than Bayside Historical Society company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Hagley Museum and Library nor Bayside Historical Society holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hagley Museum and Library nor Bayside Historical Society holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hagley Museum and Library nor Bayside Historical Society holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hagley Museum and Library nor Bayside Historical Society holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hagley Museum and Library nor Bayside Historical Society holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hagley Museum and Library nor Bayside Historical Society holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N