Comparison Overview

Hadeda Creative

VS

Rumors

Hadeda Creative

Mariner Dr, Waterloo, Ontario, N2K, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-03

With a lifelong passion for all things visual, Hadeda Creative was established in 2015 to fulfill a variety of creative avenues. We focus on graphic design solutions, photography and visual art. We specialize in branding and other solutions for entrepreneurs and small businesses. We are focused, dedicated and strive to get the job completed perfectly!

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Rumors

917 SW Oak St, Portland, OR, 97205, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

Rumors is a design studio for screen and print. We make visual systems like websites, identities, interfaces, and publications for select cultural, commercial, and editorial groups. Our focus is comprehensive, guiding projects from research and strategy through design and production. Typically we partner with cultural, institutional, and editorial clients such as the American Institute of Architects, the AIGA, Bidoun, the Canadian Centre for Architecture, the Helsinki Design Lab, The New York Times, MoMA PS1, and Verso Books. The studio’s work has been included in the Brno Design Biennial, exhibited at the Museum of Modern Art, and awarded by the AIGA, Print magazine, and the Society of Publication Designers.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 62
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hadeda-creative.jpeg
Hadeda Creative
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rumors.jpeg
Rumors
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Hadeda Creative
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rumors
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hadeda Creative in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rumors in 2025.

Incident History — Hadeda Creative (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hadeda Creative cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rumors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rumors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hadeda-creative.jpeg
Hadeda Creative
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rumors.jpeg
Rumors
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Hadeda Creative company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Rumors company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Rumors company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Hadeda Creative company.

In the current year, Rumors company and Hadeda Creative company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rumors company nor Hadeda Creative company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rumors company nor Hadeda Creative company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rumors company nor Hadeda Creative company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Hadeda Creative company nor Rumors company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Hadeda Creative nor Rumors holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Hadeda Creative company nor Rumors company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Rumors company employs more people globally than Hadeda Creative company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Hadeda Creative nor Rumors holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Hadeda Creative nor Rumors holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Hadeda Creative nor Rumors holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Hadeda Creative nor Rumors holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Hadeda Creative nor Rumors holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Hadeda Creative nor Rumors holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X