Comparison Overview

H3 Counsel LLC

VS

Buckhead Bail Bonding of Gwinnett County

H3 Counsel LLC

None
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

We are a legal recruiting firm specializing primarily in lateral attorney placements at the associate, partner, and counsel level, both nationally and internationally. As a company whose founder, JP Helder, is a former AmLaw 100 equity hiring partner and litigator, we provide a broad perspective and ability rarely found in the recruiting industry. JP is intricately involved in every aspect of the daily goings on at H3 Counsel--from resume review, to interview prep, to final negotiations for securing the best opportunity for you. We believe this value added is specific to H3 Counsel, and may provide the added benefit to your successful transition. To schedule a call with JP, please email me at [email protected]. It would be our pleasure to assist you as you evaluate your career and future.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Buckhead Bail Bonding of Gwinnett County

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Buckhead Bail Bonding of Gwinnett County is a full service bail bonds agency. We post bail bonds in Gwinnett, County, Cobb County, DeKalb, Fulton, Smyrna, and Powder Springs, Georgia 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. At Buckhead Bail Bonding of Gwinnett, we know that having a friend or family member arrested is a traumatic experience for anyone. At a time like this, what you really need is a concerned professional who can help you navigate the judicial system and get your love one back to your side ASAP. We understand that families can find themselves in situations that are trying, embarrassing and sometimes expensive. You never thought you would be looking for a bail bonding company and we are sorry that you are in this situation.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/h3-counsel-llc.jpeg
H3 Counsel LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/buckhead-bail-bonding-llc.jpeg
Buckhead Bail Bonding of Gwinnett County
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
H3 Counsel LLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Buckhead Bail Bonding of Gwinnett County
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for H3 Counsel LLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Buckhead Bail Bonding of Gwinnett County in 2025.

Incident History — H3 Counsel LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

H3 Counsel LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Buckhead Bail Bonding of Gwinnett County (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Buckhead Bail Bonding of Gwinnett County cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/h3-counsel-llc.jpeg
H3 Counsel LLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/buckhead-bail-bonding-llc.jpeg
Buckhead Bail Bonding of Gwinnett County
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Buckhead Bail Bonding of Gwinnett County company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to H3 Counsel LLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Buckhead Bail Bonding of Gwinnett County company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to H3 Counsel LLC company.

In the current year, Buckhead Bail Bonding of Gwinnett County company and H3 Counsel LLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Buckhead Bail Bonding of Gwinnett County company nor H3 Counsel LLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Buckhead Bail Bonding of Gwinnett County company nor H3 Counsel LLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Buckhead Bail Bonding of Gwinnett County company nor H3 Counsel LLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither H3 Counsel LLC company nor Buckhead Bail Bonding of Gwinnett County company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither H3 Counsel LLC nor Buckhead Bail Bonding of Gwinnett County holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither H3 Counsel LLC company nor Buckhead Bail Bonding of Gwinnett County company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both H3 Counsel LLC company and Buckhead Bail Bonding of Gwinnett County company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither H3 Counsel LLC nor Buckhead Bail Bonding of Gwinnett County holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither H3 Counsel LLC nor Buckhead Bail Bonding of Gwinnett County holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither H3 Counsel LLC nor Buckhead Bail Bonding of Gwinnett County holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither H3 Counsel LLC nor Buckhead Bail Bonding of Gwinnett County holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither H3 Counsel LLC nor Buckhead Bail Bonding of Gwinnett County holds HIPAA certification.

Neither H3 Counsel LLC nor Buckhead Bail Bonding of Gwinnett County holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X