Comparison Overview

H&M

VS

Leroy Merlin

H&M

Vasagatan 7, Stockholm, Stockholm County, SE, 111 20
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 800 and 849

At H&M, we welcome you to be yourself and feel like you truly belong. Help us reimagine the future of an entire industry by making everyone look, feel, and do good. We take pride in our history of making fashion accessible to everyone and led by our values we strive to build a more welcoming, inclusive, and sustainable industry. We are privileged to have more than 120,000 colleagues, in over 75 countries across the world. That’s 120 000 individuals with unique experiences, skills, and passions. At H&M, we believe everyone can make an impact, we believe in giving people responsibility and a strong sense of ownership. Our business is your business, and when you grow, we grow.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 67,647
Subsidiaries: 11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Leroy Merlin

Avenida de la Vega, 2, Alcobendas, Community of Madrid, 28108, ES
Last Update: 2025-11-20

Leroy Merlin is a major player in the global DIY market. We help people around the world with all their home improvement projects, from renovations and extensions, to decoration and repairs... We offer a wide range of DIY solutions that cover plumbing, lighting, heating, electricity, sanitation, security, cooking, gardening and much more. At Leroy Merlin, we believe that people are at the heart of any business. This commitment, based on our Human First strategy, has allowed us to be regularly reward by the “Great Place to Work” Institute and "Top Employers" Institute in different countries. Adapting to local markets and promoting partnerships are key drivers for Leroy Merlin. We believe that it's only by building long-lasting relationships that we can create value for everyone: our customers, co-workers, suppliers, local markets and stakeholders.

NAICS: 43
NAICS Definition: Retail Trade
Employees: 63,298
Subsidiaries: 15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/h&m.jpeg
H&M
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/leroy-merlin.jpeg
Leroy Merlin
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
H&M
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Leroy Merlin
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for H&M in 2025.

Incidents vs Retail Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Leroy Merlin in 2025.

Incident History — H&M (X = Date, Y = Severity)

H&M cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Leroy Merlin (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Leroy Merlin cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/h&m.jpeg
H&M
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/leroy-merlin.jpeg
Leroy Merlin
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Leroy Merlin company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to H&M company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Leroy Merlin company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to H&M company.

In the current year, Leroy Merlin company and H&M company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Leroy Merlin company nor H&M company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Leroy Merlin company nor H&M company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Leroy Merlin company nor H&M company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither H&M company nor Leroy Merlin company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither H&M nor Leroy Merlin holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Leroy Merlin company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to H&M company.

H&M company employs more people globally than Leroy Merlin company, reflecting its scale as a Retail.

Neither H&M nor Leroy Merlin holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither H&M nor Leroy Merlin holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither H&M nor Leroy Merlin holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither H&M nor Leroy Merlin holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither H&M nor Leroy Merlin holds HIPAA certification.

Neither H&M nor Leroy Merlin holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H