Comparison Overview

GYLDENDAL ASA

VS

Inside Cybersecurity

GYLDENDAL ASA

None
Last Update: 2025-11-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gyldendalasa.no

GYLDENDAL ASA is listed on Oslo Stock Exchange and is the parent company in the Gyldendal Group. The largest owner is Erik Must AS. Our headquarters are on Sehested’s square in downtown Oslo. Gyldendal is Norway’s largest book group with leading businesses in all parts of the value chain; publishing, distribution and trade. Postboks 6860 St. Olavs plass, OSLO, Oslo, Norway.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 27
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Inside Cybersecurity

1919 S Eads St, Arlington, 22202, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799
https://insidecybersecurity.com/

Federal cybersecurity policy is at a crossroads as emerging technologies – 5G networks, AI and cloud services – are forcing policymakers within government and industry to rethink managing risks and the possible role for regulations. Inside Cybersecurity is responding to the changing nature of cyber threats and policies with several innovations to better serve our community of readers, building on a well-established reputation for hard-driving news, analysis and perspective on what matters most. Inside Cybersecurity is committed to providing its community of readers the news, analysis and resources for meeting the needs of cybersecurity professionals, and we think these latest innovations will be crucial in collectively addressing these challenges head-on. Inside Cybersecurity is a subscription-based premium news service for policy professionals who need to know about evolving federal policies to protect cyberspace.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gyldendal-asa.jpeg
GYLDENDAL ASA
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/inside-cybersecurity.jpeg
Inside Cybersecurity
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
GYLDENDAL ASA
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Inside Cybersecurity
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GYLDENDAL ASA in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Inside Cybersecurity in 2025.

Incident History — GYLDENDAL ASA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GYLDENDAL ASA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Inside Cybersecurity (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Inside Cybersecurity cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gyldendal-asa.jpeg
GYLDENDAL ASA
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/inside-cybersecurity.jpeg
Inside Cybersecurity
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both GYLDENDAL ASA company and Inside Cybersecurity company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Inside Cybersecurity company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to GYLDENDAL ASA company.

In the current year, Inside Cybersecurity company and GYLDENDAL ASA company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Inside Cybersecurity company nor GYLDENDAL ASA company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Inside Cybersecurity company nor GYLDENDAL ASA company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Inside Cybersecurity company nor GYLDENDAL ASA company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither GYLDENDAL ASA company nor Inside Cybersecurity company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither GYLDENDAL ASA nor Inside Cybersecurity holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Inside Cybersecurity company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to GYLDENDAL ASA company.

Neither GYLDENDAL ASA nor Inside Cybersecurity holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither GYLDENDAL ASA nor Inside Cybersecurity holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither GYLDENDAL ASA nor Inside Cybersecurity holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither GYLDENDAL ASA nor Inside Cybersecurity holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither GYLDENDAL ASA nor Inside Cybersecurity holds HIPAA certification.

Neither GYLDENDAL ASA nor Inside Cybersecurity holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References