Comparison Overview

GWH Group

VS

COLAS

GWH Group

Last Update: 2025-03-16 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

GWH Group has evolved from GWH Building Pty Ltd which was formed early 1995 with the specific aim of constructing commercial and industrial property. From our early days we have grown into property development whilst maintaining a strong construction focus. GWH Group as it operates today offers clients, tenants and purchasers the peace of mind and satisfaction of dealing with an experienced and proven "one stop shop" for their property needs.

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 51-200
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

COLAS

Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

The Colas Group is a global leader in the construction and maintenance of transport infrastructure. Our mission is to design, build and maintain sustainable transport infrastructure from our local roots, around the world ๐ŸŒ Our three main activities are roads (our core business), materials and railways. Colas in numbersโ€ฆ ๐Ÿ“ 50 countries across 5 continents ๐Ÿ‘ทโ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿ‘ทโ€โ™‚๏ธ about 58,000 employees ๐Ÿšง 60,000 projects โ™ป 3,000 materials production and recycling units ๐Ÿš€ 15.5 billion euros in revenue in 2022 Colasโ€™ eight CSR commitments have been formalized in the ACT corporate project (Act and Commit Together), to respond to the expectations of its customers, employees, partners, users, investors and, more generally speaking, civil society as a whole. At Colas, we believe that itโ€™s our people that drive our company forward. We strive to develop talent, and we give those who join the company the opportunity to reach their full potential throughout their careers. Because, when you join Colas, we hope youโ€™ll make a career here.

NAICS: 23
NAICS Definition: Construction
Employees: 18,264
Subsidiaries: 119
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gwh-group.jpeg
GWH Group
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colas.jpeg
COLAS
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
GWH Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
COLAS
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GWH Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Construction Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for COLAS in 2025.

Incident History โ€” GWH Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GWH Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” COLAS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

COLAS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gwh-group.jpeg
GWH Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/colas.jpeg
COLAS
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Both GWH Group company and COLAS company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

COLAS company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas GWH Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, COLAS company has reported more cyber incidents than GWH Group company.

Neither COLAS company nor GWH Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

COLAS company has disclosed at least one data breach, while GWH Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

COLAS company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while GWH Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither GWH Group company nor COLAS company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

COLAS company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to GWH Group company.

COLAS company employs more people globally than GWH Group company, reflecting its scale as a Construction.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

TS3 Manager is modern web interface for maintaining Teamspeak3 servers. A reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability has been identified in versions 2.2.1 and earlier. The vulnerability exists in the error handling mechanism of the login page, where malicious scripts embedded in server hostnames are executed in the victim's browser context without proper sanitization. This issue is fixed in version 2.2.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

TS3 Manager is modern web interface for maintaining Teamspeak3 servers. A Denial of Dervice vulnerability has been identified in versions 2.2.1 and earlier. The vulnerability permits an unauthenticated actor to crash the application through the submission of specially crafted Unicode input, requiring no prior authentication or privileges. The flaw manifests when Unicode tag characters are submitted to the Server field on the login page. The application fails to properly handle these characters during the ASCII conversion process, resulting in an unhandled exception that terminates the application within four to five seconds of submission. This issue is fixed in version 2.2.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Weblate is a web based localization tool. An open redirect exists in versions 5.13.2 and below via the redir parameter on .within.website when Weblate is configured with Anubis and REDIRECT_DOMAINS is not set. An attacker can craft a URL on the legitimate domain that redirects a victim to an attacker-controlled site. The redirect can also be used to initiate drive-by downloads (redirecting to a URL that serves a malicious file), increasing the risk to end users. This issue is fixed in version 5.13.3.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Termix is a web-based server management platform with SSH terminal, tunneling, and file editing capabilities. The official Docker image for Termix versions 1.5.0 and below, due to being configured with an Nginx reverse proxy, causes the backend to retrieve the proxy's IP instead of the client's IP when using the req.ip method. This results in isLocalhost always returning True. Consequently, the /ssh/db/host/internal endpoint can be accessed directly without login or authentication. This endpoint records the system's stored SSH host information, including addresses, usernames, and passwords, posing an extremely high security risk. Users who use the official Termix docker image, build their own image using the official dockerfile, or utilize reverse proxy functionality will be affected by this vulnerability. This issue is fixed in version 1.6.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OpenPLC_V3 has a vulnerability in the enipThread function that occurs due to the lack of a return value. This leads to a crash when the server loop ends and execution hits an illegal ud2 instruction. This issue can be triggered remotely without authentication by starting the same server multiple times or if the server exits unexpectedly. The vulnerability allows an attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) against the PLC runtime, stopping any PC started remotely without authentication. This results in the PLC process crashing and halting all automation or control logic managed by OpenPLC.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X