Comparison Overview

Gunty and McCarthy

VS

Instruct A Conveyancer

Gunty and McCarthy

150 S. Wacker Drive, Chicago, Illinois, 60606-4163, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1991, we are an A-V rated insurance defense firm, committed to providing our clients with personalized services and performance unmatched by larger law firms. Our firm environment is designed to provide you with the personal attention so often lacking in most defense firms. We work together in a team effort to resolve all matters in controversy as favorably and cost-effectively as possible, always with the best interests of our clients in mind.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 42
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Instruct A Conveyancer

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Utilising Direct Mail Marketing solutions, we champion the best regional conveyancing service available to home movers, identified by our market research team at Conveyancer Insights. We work with some of the most respected conveyancing firms and solicitors across England and Wales who strive to deliver a first class conveyancing service for their clients. We believe that they deserve support. We are launching the service within a limited number of locations initially. Instruct A Conveyancer is a brand created and operated by Property Searches Direct Limited.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gunty-and-mccarthy.jpeg
Gunty and McCarthy
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/instruct-a-conveyancer.jpeg
Instruct A Conveyancer
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Gunty and McCarthy
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Instruct A Conveyancer
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gunty and McCarthy in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Instruct A Conveyancer in 2025.

Incident History — Gunty and McCarthy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gunty and McCarthy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Instruct A Conveyancer (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Instruct A Conveyancer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gunty-and-mccarthy.jpeg
Gunty and McCarthy
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/instruct-a-conveyancer.jpeg
Instruct A Conveyancer
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Gunty and McCarthy company and Instruct A Conveyancer company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Instruct A Conveyancer company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Gunty and McCarthy company.

In the current year, Instruct A Conveyancer company and Gunty and McCarthy company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Instruct A Conveyancer company nor Gunty and McCarthy company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Instruct A Conveyancer company nor Gunty and McCarthy company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Instruct A Conveyancer company nor Gunty and McCarthy company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Gunty and McCarthy company nor Instruct A Conveyancer company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Gunty and McCarthy nor Instruct A Conveyancer holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Gunty and McCarthy company nor Instruct A Conveyancer company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Gunty and McCarthy nor Instruct A Conveyancer holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Gunty and McCarthy nor Instruct A Conveyancer holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Gunty and McCarthy nor Instruct A Conveyancer holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Gunty and McCarthy nor Instruct A Conveyancer holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Gunty and McCarthy nor Instruct A Conveyancer holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Gunty and McCarthy nor Instruct A Conveyancer holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X