Comparison Overview

Gulfport Behavioral Health System

VS

Cottonwood Springs

Gulfport Behavioral Health System

None
Last Update: 2026-01-21
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://gulfportbehavioral.com/

We offer mental and behavioral health services to adults (18 and older), adolescents (12 to17), pre-adolescents (8 to 11), and is the only provider to children (ages 4 to 7) in the six southern counties in Mississippi. Evidence-based treatment programs are designed to stabilize patients’ emotional or mental health issues and promote long-term recovery and mental wellness.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Cottonwood Springs

13351 S Arapaho Drive, Olathe, KS, 66062, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cottonwoodsprings.com

Cottonwood Springs is a 72-bed behavioral facility outside of Kansas City. The hospital offers inpatient and outpatient mental health and addiction treatment to adults and seniors. Our mission is to change people’s lives by delivering innovative and evidence-based treatment in a professional and compassionate environment that creates a foundation for long term healing and recovery.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 95
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gulfport-behavioral-health-system.jpeg
Gulfport Behavioral Health System
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cottonwood-springs.jpeg
Cottonwood Springs
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Gulfport Behavioral Health System
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cottonwood Springs
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gulfport Behavioral Health System in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cottonwood Springs in 2026.

Incident History — Gulfport Behavioral Health System (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gulfport Behavioral Health System cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cottonwood Springs (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cottonwood Springs cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gulfport-behavioral-health-system.jpeg
Gulfport Behavioral Health System
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cottonwood-springs.jpeg
Cottonwood Springs
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Gulfport Behavioral Health System company and Cottonwood Springs company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Cottonwood Springs company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Gulfport Behavioral Health System company.

In the current year, Cottonwood Springs company and Gulfport Behavioral Health System company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cottonwood Springs company nor Gulfport Behavioral Health System company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cottonwood Springs company nor Gulfport Behavioral Health System company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cottonwood Springs company nor Gulfport Behavioral Health System company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Gulfport Behavioral Health System company nor Cottonwood Springs company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Gulfport Behavioral Health System nor Cottonwood Springs holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Cottonwood Springs company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Gulfport Behavioral Health System company.

Cottonwood Springs company employs more people globally than Gulfport Behavioral Health System company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Gulfport Behavioral Health System nor Cottonwood Springs holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Gulfport Behavioral Health System nor Cottonwood Springs holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Gulfport Behavioral Health System nor Cottonwood Springs holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Gulfport Behavioral Health System nor Cottonwood Springs holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Gulfport Behavioral Health System nor Cottonwood Springs holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Gulfport Behavioral Health System nor Cottonwood Springs holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References