Comparison Overview

Gulf Coast Village

VS

Mt Carmel Rehabilitation and Nursing Center

Gulf Coast Village

1333 Santa Barbara Blvd, Cape Coral, FL, 33991, US
Last Update: 2025-12-24

Gulf Coast Village is the only Continuing Care Retirement Community in Cape Coral, Florida, where seniors can find integrated care with independent living, assisted living, memory support, skilled nursing and rehabilitation, all under one roof. Our healthcare services are designed to preserve and promote the highest possible level of independence, regardless of age, health status and physical limitations. Expertly trained, our compassionate care team combines professional know-how and dedication with friendliness and warmth. We work together with residents and their families to provide individualized attention that enhances the quality of life and overall well-being of our residents. Some of the additional services offered include a wellness program, outpatient rehabilitation services, The Village Chapel, and meeting space and catering. Gulf Coast Village is a nonprofit 501(c)(3), sponsored by Volunteers of America National Services.

NAICS: 623
NAICS Definition: Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities
Employees: 119
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Mt Carmel Rehabilitation and Nursing Center

235 Myrtle St, None, Manchester, New Hampshire, US, 03104
Last Update: 2025-12-24

Mt Carmel, a Catholic Charities NH community, strives to deliver person-centric holistic care that addresses the needs of each individual’s mind, body and spirit, while enabling them to achieve their highest level of independence and live their life to the fullest each day. We proudly serve individuals of all backgrounds, beliefs and faiths.

NAICS: 623
NAICS Definition: Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gulf-coast-village.jpeg
Gulf Coast Village
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mt-carmel-rehabilitation-and-nursing-center.jpeg
Mt Carmel Rehabilitation and Nursing Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Gulf Coast Village
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Mt Carmel Rehabilitation and Nursing Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gulf Coast Village in 2025.

Incidents vs Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mt Carmel Rehabilitation and Nursing Center in 2025.

Incident History — Gulf Coast Village (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gulf Coast Village cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Mt Carmel Rehabilitation and Nursing Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mt Carmel Rehabilitation and Nursing Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gulf-coast-village.jpeg
Gulf Coast Village
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mt-carmel-rehabilitation-and-nursing-center.jpeg
Mt Carmel Rehabilitation and Nursing Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Mt Carmel Rehabilitation and Nursing Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Gulf Coast Village company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Mt Carmel Rehabilitation and Nursing Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Gulf Coast Village company.

In the current year, Mt Carmel Rehabilitation and Nursing Center company and Gulf Coast Village company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Mt Carmel Rehabilitation and Nursing Center company nor Gulf Coast Village company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Mt Carmel Rehabilitation and Nursing Center company nor Gulf Coast Village company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Mt Carmel Rehabilitation and Nursing Center company nor Gulf Coast Village company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Gulf Coast Village company nor Mt Carmel Rehabilitation and Nursing Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Gulf Coast Village nor Mt Carmel Rehabilitation and Nursing Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Gulf Coast Village company nor Mt Carmel Rehabilitation and Nursing Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Gulf Coast Village company employs more people globally than Mt Carmel Rehabilitation and Nursing Center company, reflecting its scale as a Nursing Homes and Residential Care Facilities.

Neither Gulf Coast Village nor Mt Carmel Rehabilitation and Nursing Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Gulf Coast Village nor Mt Carmel Rehabilitation and Nursing Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Gulf Coast Village nor Mt Carmel Rehabilitation and Nursing Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Gulf Coast Village nor Mt Carmel Rehabilitation and Nursing Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Gulf Coast Village nor Mt Carmel Rehabilitation and Nursing Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Gulf Coast Village nor Mt Carmel Rehabilitation and Nursing Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

httparty is an API tool. In versions 0.23.2 and prior, httparty is vulnerable to SSRF. This issue can pose a risk of leaking API keys, and it can also allow third parties to issue requests to internal servers. This issue has been patched via commit 0529bcd.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

5ire is a cross-platform desktop artificial intelligence assistant and model context protocol client. In versions 0.15.2 and prior, an RCE vulnerability exists in useMarkdown.ts, where the markdown-it-mermaid plugin is initialized with securityLevel: 'loose'. This configuration explicitly permits the rendering of HTML tags within Mermaid diagram nodes. This issue has not been patched at time of publication.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

continuwuity is a Matrix homeserver written in Rust. Prior to version 0.5.0, this vulnerability allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to force the target server to cryptographically sign arbitrary membership events. The flaw exists because the server fails to validate the origin of a signing request, provided the event's state_key is a valid user ID belonging to the target server. This issue has been patched in version 0.5.0. A workaround for this issue involves blocking access to the PUT /_matrix/federation/v2/invite/{roomId}/{eventId} endpoint using the reverse proxy.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

LangChain is a framework for building LLM-powered applications. Prior to @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and prior to langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain JS's toJSON() method (and subsequently when string-ifying objects using JSON.stringify(). The method did not escape objects with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form data in kwargs. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in @langchain/core versions 0.3.80 and 1.1.8, and langchain versions 0.3.37 and 1.2.3

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

LangChain is a framework for building agents and LLM-powered applications. Prior to versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5, a serialization injection vulnerability exists in LangChain's dumps() and dumpd() functions. The functions do not escape dictionaries with 'lc' keys when serializing free-form dictionaries. The 'lc' key is used internally by LangChain to mark serialized objects. When user-controlled data contains this key structure, it is treated as a legitimate LangChain object during deserialization rather than plain user data. This issue has been patched in versions 0.3.81 and 1.2.5.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N