Comparison Overview

Exploreum Science Center

VS

Cincinnati Art Museum

Exploreum Science Center

65 Government Street, Mobile, Alabama, 36602, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

With numerous interactive exhibits, thought-provoking larger-than-life Giant Screen films, and fun, hands-on educational programming, the Exploreum Science Center aspires to increase science literacy among the people of south Alabama and the Gulf Coast region, residents and visitors alike. By sparking imagination, creating curiosity and instilling a sense of wonder in the world, the Exploreum has been a cornerstone of informal learning on the Gulf Coast since its inception more than 35 years ago. Thanks to the ongoing support of the community – visionary civic leaders, generous donors and volunteers – the Exploreum continues to offer educational opportunities in a fun learning environment.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Cincinnati Art Museum

953 Eden Park Drive, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45206, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

Located in scenic Eden Park, the Cincinnati Art Museum features an unparalleled art collection of more than 65,000 works spanning 6,000 years. In addition to displaying its own broad collection, the Art Museum also hosts several national and international traveling exhibitions each year. Visitors can enjoy the exhibitions or participate in the Art Museum’s wide range of art-related programs, activities and special events. General admission is always free for all, plus Art Museum members receive additional benefits. The Art Museum is open six days a week, making greater Cincinnati’s most treasured cultural asset accessible to everyone. The Cincinnati Art Museum is supported by the generosity of individuals and businesses that give annually to ArtsWave. The Ohio Arts Council helped fund the Cincinnati Art Museum with state tax dollars to encourage economic growth, educational excellence and cultural enrichment for all Ohioans. The Cincinnati Art Museum gratefully acknowledges operating support from the City of Cincinnati, as well as our members.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 204
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gulf-coast-exploreum-and-imax-theater.jpeg
Exploreum Science Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cincinnati-art-museum.jpeg
Cincinnati Art Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Exploreum Science Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cincinnati Art Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Exploreum Science Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cincinnati Art Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Exploreum Science Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Exploreum Science Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cincinnati Art Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cincinnati Art Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/gulf-coast-exploreum-and-imax-theater.jpeg
Exploreum Science Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cincinnati-art-museum.jpeg
Cincinnati Art Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Exploreum Science Center company and Cincinnati Art Museum company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Cincinnati Art Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Exploreum Science Center company.

In the current year, Cincinnati Art Museum company and Exploreum Science Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cincinnati Art Museum company nor Exploreum Science Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cincinnati Art Museum company nor Exploreum Science Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cincinnati Art Museum company nor Exploreum Science Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Exploreum Science Center company nor Cincinnati Art Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Exploreum Science Center nor Cincinnati Art Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Exploreum Science Center company nor Cincinnati Art Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Cincinnati Art Museum company employs more people globally than Exploreum Science Center company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Exploreum Science Center nor Cincinnati Art Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Exploreum Science Center nor Cincinnati Art Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Exploreum Science Center nor Cincinnati Art Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Exploreum Science Center nor Cincinnati Art Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Exploreum Science Center nor Cincinnati Art Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Exploreum Science Center nor Cincinnati Art Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H